- A
Allow SSH only from a specific management subnet
Why wrong: This reduces the attack surface but does not address the failed attempts from an already allowed IP.
- B
Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts
Account lockout prevents brute-force attacks by temporarily disabling the account.
- C
Install a host-based IDS on the server
Why wrong: HIDS can detect but not prevent brute-force attacks.
- D
Disable SSH and use Telnet instead
Why wrong: Telnet is unencrypted and less secure than SSH.
Quick Answer
The correct answer is to implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts. This control directly mitigates SSH brute force attacks by enforcing a threshold that halts password guessing after a defined number of failures, preventing automated scripts or manual attempts from continuing indefinitely. On the CompTIA SecurityX CAS-004 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of authentication policy controls as a defense against credential-based attacks, often appearing in log analysis questions where you must distinguish between technical controls like rate limiting versus administrative controls like account lockout. A common trap is choosing to block the IP address, but that fails against dynamic or internal attackers, whereas lockout stops the attack at the user account level without disrupting legitimate traffic. Memory tip: think “five strikes, you’re out” to remember the lockout threshold as a direct counter to password guessing.
CAS-004 Governance, Risk and Compliance Practice Question
This CAS-004 practice question tests your understanding of governance, risk and compliance. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A security engineer is reviewing firewall logs and finds multiple failed SSH attempts from an internal IP. Which control should be implemented to reduce this risk?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts
Option B is correct because implementing an account lockout policy after a defined number of failed attempts (e.g., 5) directly mitigates brute-force or password-guessing attacks against SSH. This control enforces a threshold that stops automated scripts or manual attempts from continuing, reducing the risk of unauthorized access without blocking legitimate administrative traffic.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Allow SSH only from a specific management subnet
Why it's wrong here
This reduces the attack surface but does not address the failed attempts from an already allowed IP.
- ✓
Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts
Why this is correct
Account lockout prevents brute-force attacks by temporarily disabling the account.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Install a host-based IDS on the server
Why it's wrong here
HIDS can detect but not prevent brute-force attacks.
- ✗
Disable SSH and use Telnet instead
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often choose a network-based control like subnet restriction (Option A) because it seems logical to limit access, but they overlook that the failed attempts are already coming from an internal IP, meaning the attacker is already inside the trusted zone and subnet filtering alone will not stop the attack.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Account lockout policies are typically enforced via PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) on Linux systems, using modules like pam_tally2 or pam_faillock to track failed login attempts per user. The lockout duration and threshold are configurable in /etc/pam.d/sshd or /etc/security/faillock.conf, and the lockout can be applied per user or globally. In a real-world scenario, combining account lockout with rate-limiting (e.g., fail2ban) provides defense in depth against both targeted and distributed brute-force attacks.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A network engineer segments a warehouse floor into three subnets: 20 scanners, 5 printers, and 2 management hosts. Picking the wrong mask wastes addresses or leaves too few usable hosts. Exam questions test whether you can apply CIDR notation, calculate block size, and identify the correct usable-host range for a given prefix.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Governance, Risk and Compliance — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Governance, Risk and Compliance practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All CAS-004 questions
510 questions across all exam domains
- →
CompTIA SecurityX CAS-004 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
CAS-004 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related CAS-004 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Scripting, Containers and Automation practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to Scripting, Containers and Automation.
Application Environment, Configuration and Security practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to Application Environment, Configuration and Security.
Governance, Risk and Compliance practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to Governance, Risk and Compliance.
Security Engineering practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to Security Engineering.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to Security Operations.
CAS-004 fundamentals practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to CAS-004 fundamentals.
CAS-004 scenario practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to CAS-004 scenario.
CAS-004 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise CAS-004 questions linked to CAS-004 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free CAS-004 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this CAS-004 question test?
Governance, Risk and Compliance — This question tests Governance, Risk and Compliance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts — Option B is correct because implementing an account lockout policy after a defined number of failed attempts (e.g., 5) directly mitigates brute-force or password-guessing attacks against SSH. This control enforces a threshold that stops automated scripts or manual attempts from continuing, reducing the risk of unauthorized access without blocking legitimate administrative traffic.
What should I do if I get this CAS-004 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This CAS-004 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAS-004 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.