Courseiva
hardMultiple Choice

CAS-004 Practice Question: Uses AWS, Azure, and GCP for different workloads

An organization uses AWS, Azure, and GCP for different workloads. They want a single tool to manage infrastructure consistently across all providers. Which approach is most appropriate?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often mistakenly choose a single-vendor tool like CloudFormation or ARM templates for multi-cloud management. The correct approach uses a cloud-agnostic tool that abstracts provider APIs.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Use Terraform with provider plugins

Terraform is an infrastructure-as-code tool that uses provider plugins to interact with the APIs of AWS, Azure, GCP, and hundreds of other services. This allows a single declarative configuration language (HCL) to manage resources consistently across all three cloud providers, making it the most appropriate choice for multi-cloud infrastructure management.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Use Terraform with provider plugins

    Why this is correct

    Terraform's provider plugins translate a single declarative configuration into each cloud's native API calls, so one workflow and state file manage AWS, Azure and GCP resources. That satisfies the requirement for consistent multi-provider infrastructure management without separate tooling per cloud.

  • ✗

    Use Azure Resource Manager templates

    Why it's wrong here

    Azure Resource Manager templates deploy only to Azure; they cannot target AWS or GCP resources, so they fail the multi-cloud requirement outright. They are tempting because ARM templates provide declarative, repeatable infrastructure-as-code within a single Azure subscription or management group — the right choice when all workloads live in Azure.

  • ✗

    Write provider-specific scripts in PowerShell

    Why it's wrong here

    PowerShell scripts remain provider-specific, so each cloud's cmdlets and authentication differ, leaving three separate codebases rather than one consistent tool. It is tempting because PowerShell excels at automating Windows and Azure administration, and would be the right choice for managing a single Microsoft-centric estate.

  • ✗

    Use AWS CloudFormation

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS CloudFormation templates deploy only AWS resources; it cannot provision Azure or GCP infrastructure, so it fails the multi-cloud requirement outright. It is tempting because CloudFormation is AWS's native infrastructure-as-code service, and it would be the right choice for standardising deployments confined entirely to a single AWS estate.

About these practice questions

One of 973 original CAS-005 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CAS-005 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAS-005 exam.