Question 63 of 510
Governance, Risk and ComplianceeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is to implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts. This control directly mitigates SSH brute force attacks by enforcing a threshold that halts password guessing after a defined number of failures, preventing automated scripts or manual attempts from continuing indefinitely. On the CompTIA SecurityX CAS-004 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of authentication policy controls as a defense against credential-based attacks, often appearing in log analysis questions where you must distinguish between technical controls like rate limiting versus administrative controls like account lockout. A common trap is choosing to block the IP address, but that fails against dynamic or internal attackers, whereas lockout stops the attack at the user account level without disrupting legitimate traffic. Memory tip: think “five strikes, you’re out” to remember the lockout threshold as a direct counter to password guessing.

CAS-004 Governance, Risk and Compliance Practice Question

This CAS-004 practice question tests your understanding of governance, risk and compliance. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security engineer is reviewing firewall logs and finds multiple failed SSH attempts from an internal IP. Which control should be implemented to reduce this risk?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts

Option B is correct because implementing an account lockout policy after a defined number of failed attempts (e.g., 5) directly mitigates brute-force or password-guessing attacks against SSH. This control enforces a threshold that stops automated scripts or manual attempts from continuing, reducing the risk of unauthorized access without blocking legitimate administrative traffic.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Allow SSH only from a specific management subnet

    Why it's wrong here

    This reduces the attack surface but does not address the failed attempts from an already allowed IP.

  • Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts

    Why this is correct

    Account lockout prevents brute-force attacks by temporarily disabling the account.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Install a host-based IDS on the server

    Why it's wrong here

    HIDS can detect but not prevent brute-force attacks.

  • Disable SSH and use Telnet instead

    Why it's wrong here

    Telnet is unencrypted and less secure than SSH.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often choose a network-based control like subnet restriction (Option A) because it seems logical to limit access, but they overlook that the failed attempts are already coming from an internal IP, meaning the attacker is already inside the trusted zone and subnet filtering alone will not stop the attack.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Account lockout policies are typically enforced via PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) on Linux systems, using modules like pam_tally2 or pam_faillock to track failed login attempts per user. The lockout duration and threshold are configurable in /etc/pam.d/sshd or /etc/security/faillock.conf, and the lockout can be applied per user or globally. In a real-world scenario, combining account lockout with rate-limiting (e.g., fail2ban) provides defense in depth against both targeted and distributed brute-force attacks.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer segments a warehouse floor into three subnets: 20 scanners, 5 printers, and 2 management hosts. Picking the wrong mask wastes addresses or leaves too few usable hosts. Exam questions test whether you can apply CIDR notation, calculate block size, and identify the correct usable-host range for a given prefix.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CAS-004 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CAS-004 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CAS-004 question test?

Governance, Risk and Compliance — This question tests Governance, Risk and Compliance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Implement account lockout after 5 failed attempts — Option B is correct because implementing an account lockout policy after a defined number of failed attempts (e.g., 5) directly mitigates brute-force or password-guessing attacks against SSH. This control enforces a threshold that stops automated scripts or manual attempts from continuing, reducing the risk of unauthorized access without blocking legitimate administrative traffic.

What should I do if I get this CAS-004 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CAS-004 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAS-004 exam.