A technician is tasked with disposing of a server that contains multiple SAS hard drives. The company's data destruction policy mandates that drives must be rendered unreadable by any means. Which combination of methods ensures compliance?
Degaussing erases magnetic media, and shredding physically destroys the drives, ensuring no data recovery is possible.
Why this answer
Option B is correct because degaussing destroys the magnetic field on SAS hard drives, making data unrecoverable, and shredding physically destroys the platters, ensuring compliance with a policy that mandates drives be rendered unreadable by any means. This combination addresses both magnetic and physical recovery methods, which is necessary for high-security data destruction.
Exam trap
CompTIA A+ often tests the misconception that a full format or software overwrite is sufficient for secure data destruction, but the key trap here is that the policy requires drives to be rendered unreadable by any means, which mandates physical destruction or degaussing, not just logical erasure.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because a full format only removes the file system pointers and may not overwrite all sectors, leaving data recoverable with forensic tools. Option C is wrong because overwriting with zeros using a software tool may not be effective on SAS drives if the drive's firmware remaps bad sectors or if the drive is damaged, and it does not physically destroy the media. Option D is wrong because storing drives in a locked cabinet does not destroy or render data unreadable; it only delays access, violating the policy that mandates drives must be rendered unreadable by any means.