- A
The PSP API version needs to be updated to v1
Why wrong: PSP was removed entirely, not just deprecated. No API version is available.
- B
PSPs were replaced by NetworkPolicies in 1.25
Why wrong: PSPs were replaced by Pod Security Standards (PodSecurity admission), not NetworkPolicies.
- C
PSP support was removed from Kubernetes in 1.25
Correct. PodSecurityPolicy was removed in Kubernetes 1.25.
- D
The PSP was not applied to the correct namespace
Why wrong: PSP is a cluster-level resource, not namespace-scoped. But even if it was applied correctly, it would not work in 1.25.
CKS System Hardening Practice Question
This CKS practice question tests your understanding of system hardening. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A cluster administrator has applied a PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) to restrict privileged containers. After upgrading to Kubernetes 1.25, they notice that PSPs are no longer working. What is the MOST likely reason?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"most likely"Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
PSP support was removed from Kubernetes in 1.25
PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) was deprecated in Kubernetes 1.21 and completely removed in Kubernetes 1.25, meaning the PSP admission controller and API resource no longer exist in that version. The cluster administrator's PSPs stopped working because the feature was removed entirely, not due to a configuration or versioning issue. The replacement is Pod Security Admission (PSA), which uses built-in admission controllers and Pod Security Standards.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The PSP API version needs to be updated to v1
Why it's wrong here
PSP was removed entirely, not just deprecated. No API version is available.
- ✗
PSPs were replaced by NetworkPolicies in 1.25
Why it's wrong here
PSPs were replaced by Pod Security Standards (PodSecurity admission), not NetworkPolicies.
- ✓
PSP support was removed from Kubernetes in 1.25
Why this is correct
Correct. PodSecurityPolicy was removed in Kubernetes 1.25.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
The PSP was not applied to the correct namespace
Why it's wrong here
PSP is a cluster-level resource, not namespace-scoped. But even if it was applied correctly, it would not work in 1.25.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may think PSPs are merely deprecated or need a version update, but the CKS exam tests the specific knowledge that PSP was removed entirely in 1.25, and that NetworkPolicies serve a completely different purpose.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
PSP was implemented as an admission controller that evaluated pod specs against a set of security policies before creation, using the `PodSecurityPolicy` resource in the `policy/v1beta1` API group. In Kubernetes 1.25, the `PodSecurity` admission controller (with modes: privileged, baseline, restricted) replaced PSP, enforcing Pod Security Standards at the namespace level via labels like `pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce`. A real-world scenario is a cluster upgrade where existing PSPs silently stop working, requiring migration to PSA labels or a third-party admission webhook like OPA/Gatekeeper.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A junior network technician can log in to a core router but cannot reach the enable prompt or configuration mode. The AAA server is authenticating the login — but the authorisation policy only grants privilege level 1, not 15. Authentication (who you are) is working; authorisation (what you can do) is not.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
System Hardening — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
System Hardening practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All CKS questions
997 questions across all exam domains
- →
Certified Kubernetes Security Specialist CKS study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
CKS practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related CKS practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Monitoring Logging and Runtime Security practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Monitoring Logging and Runtime Security.
Cluster Setup and Hardening practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Cluster Setup and Hardening.
System Hardening practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to System Hardening.
Minimize Microservice Vulnerabilities practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Minimize Microservice Vulnerabilities.
Supply Chain Security practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Supply Chain Security.
Monitoring, Logging and Runtime Security practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Monitoring, Logging and Runtime Security.
Cluster Setup practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Cluster Setup.
Cluster Hardening practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to Cluster Hardening.
CKS fundamentals practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to CKS fundamentals.
CKS scenario practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to CKS scenario.
CKS troubleshooting practice questions
Practise CKS questions linked to CKS troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free CKS practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this CKS question test?
System Hardening — This question tests System Hardening — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: PSP support was removed from Kubernetes in 1.25 — PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) was deprecated in Kubernetes 1.21 and completely removed in Kubernetes 1.25, meaning the PSP admission controller and API resource no longer exist in that version. The cluster administrator's PSPs stopped working because the feature was removed entirely, not due to a configuration or versioning issue. The replacement is Pod Security Admission (PSA), which uses built-in admission controllers and Pod Security Standards.
What should I do if I get this CKS question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This CKS practice question is part of Courseiva's free CNCF certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CKS exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.