Courseiva
Question 1,362 of 1,420
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-401 Practice Question: A network team is using Ansible with the…

A network team is using Ansible with the iosxr_config module to push configuration changes to a Cisco IOS-XR router. The playbook uses the REST API via the 'ansible_connection: restconf' setting. The engineer notices that the changes are applied but the playbook reports 'changed: false' even when changes were made. What is the most likely reason for this behavior?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The engineer should use the 'uri' module with the REST API instead of the 'iosxr_config' module.

When using RESTCONF, the Ansible module may not detect changes if the module does not properly parse the response from the device. However, in this scenario, the issue is that the 'iosxr_config' module is designed for CLI-based connections, not RESTCONF. The correct approach is to use a module like 'iosxr_restconf' or a generic 'uri' module. The 'ansible_connection: restconf' is not a valid connection type for Ansible; Ansible uses 'network_cli' or 'ansible.netcommon.restconf' connection plugin. The engineer should use the 'uri' module or a dedicated RESTCONF module.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The REST API on the router does not return a proper response, so Ansible cannot determine if a change occurred.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect because the REST API does return responses; the issue is with how Ansible is configured.

  • The engineer should use the 'uri' module with the REST API instead of the 'iosxr_config' module.

    Why this is correct

    Correct because 'iosxr_config' is for CLI-based connections; for RESTCONF, the 'uri' module or a dedicated RESTCONF module should be used.

  • The playbook is missing the 'gather_facts: no' directive, causing Ansible to skip change detection.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect because gather_facts does not affect change detection for RESTCONF operations.

  • The router requires a commit operation after configuration changes, and Ansible does not perform that.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect because IOS-XR with RESTCONF may require commit, but the issue is the module choice, not the commit.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-401 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-401 exam.