Question 1,285 of 2,152
VRF-LitemediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is that VRF-Lite supports dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF and EIGRP within each VRF. This is true because VRF-Lite creates multiple isolated routing tables on a single router, allowing each virtual routing and forwarding instance to run its own routing process independently, whether static or dynamic, without requiring MPLS. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how to segment traffic in an enterprise network using simple, MPLS-free VRF configurations. A common trap is assuming VRF-Lite requires MPLS or provides encryption—it does neither; it is purely a Layer 3 separation tool. Remember the memory tip: VRF-Lite is “light” because it skips MPLS, but it still runs full dynamic routing per VRF.

300-410 VRF-Lite Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of vrf-lite. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO statements are true regarding the use of VRF-Lite in a Cisco Enterprise network? (Choose TWO.)

Question 1mediummulti select
Read the full VRF explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

VRF-Lite enables multiple virtual routing tables on a single router, providing traffic separation without MPLS.

VRF-Lite allows multiple routing tables on a single router, enabling traffic separation without MPLS. It relies on static routes or dynamic routing protocols like OSPF, EIGRP, or BGP within each VRF. The incorrect options: MPLS is not required for VRF-Lite; VRF-Lite does not support MPLS VPNv4 route exchange (that requires MPLS); and VRF-Lite does not inherently provide encryption.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • VRF-Lite enables multiple virtual routing tables on a single router, providing traffic separation without MPLS.

    Why this is correct

    VRF-Lite creates separate routing tables per VRF, isolating traffic at Layer 3 without needing MPLS.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • VRF-Lite supports dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF and EIGRP within each VRF.

    Why this is correct

    Dynamic routing can be configured per VRF, allowing separate routing domains to exchange routes.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • VRF-Lite requires MPLS to exchange VPNv4 routes between routers.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF-Lite does not use MPLS; VPNv4 route exchange requires MPLS and MP-BGP.

  • VRF-Lite can automatically encrypt traffic between VRFs using IPsec.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF-Lite does not provide encryption; IPsec must be configured separately if needed.

  • VRF-Lite can only be used with static routing.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF-Lite supports both static and dynamic routing protocols, not just static.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

VRF-Lite — This question tests VRF-Lite — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: VRF-Lite enables multiple virtual routing tables on a single router, providing traffic separation without MPLS. — VRF-Lite allows multiple routing tables on a single router, enabling traffic separation without MPLS. It relies on static routes or dynamic routing protocols like OSPF, EIGRP, or BGP within each VRF. The incorrect options: MPLS is not required for VRF-Lite; VRF-Lite does not support MPLS VPNv4 route exchange (that requires MPLS); and VRF-Lite does not inherently provide encryption.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.