hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
300-410 Practice Question: Runs the following command on Router R1: R1# show…
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 longer-prefixes
Routing entry for 10.0.0.0/22 Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 2172416, type internal Last update from 192.168.1.2 on GigabitEthernet0/0, 00:00:10 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 192.168.1.2, from 192.168.1.2, 00:00:10 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/0
Route metric is 2172416, traffic share count is 1
Routing entry for 10.0.1.0/24 Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 2812416, type internal Last update from 192.168.1.2 on GigabitEthernet0/0, 00:00:10 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 192.168.1.2, from 192.168.1.2, 00:00:10 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/0
Route metric is 2812416, traffic share count is 1
Based on this output, what is the effect of the summary route 10.0.0.0/22?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The summary route is not suppressing the more specific route 10.0.1.0/24.
The presence of both the summary route (10.0.0.0/22) and a more specific route (10.0.1.0/24) in the routing table indicates that the summary route is not suppressing the more specific routes, possibly due to a configuration issue or because the summary is not configured as a discard route.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The summary route is working correctly and suppressing all specifics.
Why it's wrong here
A more specific route (10.0.1.0/24) is still present.
- ✓
The summary route is not suppressing the more specific route 10.0.1.0/24.
Why this is correct
Both the summary and a more specific route are in the table, indicating the summary is not suppressing specifics.
- ✗
The summary route has a better metric than the specific route.
Why it's wrong here
The metric is lower (2172416 vs 2812416), but the issue is suppression.
- ✗
The summary route is not installed in the routing table.
Why it's wrong here
It is installed.
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.