mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
300-410 Practice Question: Runs the following command to troubleshoot a…
A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot a Route Summarization issue:
R1# show ip ospf database summary 10.0.0.0
OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)
Summary Net Link States (Area 0)
LS age: 100 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: Summary Links(Network) Link State ID: 10.0.0.0 (summary Network Number) Advertising Router: 2.2.2.2 LS Seq Number: 80000001 Checksum: 0x1234 Length: 28 Network Mask: /16 TOS: 0 Metric: 20
What does this output indicate?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The summary route 10.0.0.0/16 is being advertised by router 2.2.2.2 as a Type 3 LSA into Area 0.
This output shows the OSPF database entry for a summary route 10.0.0.0/16. The LS Type is Summary Links, indicating it is a Type 3 LSA generated by an ABR (advertising router 2.2.2.2). The metric of 20 suggests it is a summary route injected into Area 0.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The summary route 10.0.0.0/16 is being advertised by router 2.2.2.2 as a Type 3 LSA into Area 0.
Why this is correct
The LS Type and advertising router confirm it is a Type 3 summary LSA.
- ✗
The summary route is a Type 5 external LSA from an ASBR.
Why it's wrong here
The LS Type is Summary Links, not External.
- ✗
The summary route is a Type 1 router LSA from router 2.2.2.2.
Why it's wrong here
The output shows a Summary Net Link State (Type 3 LSA) with network mask /16, not a Type 1 router LSA. Type 1 LSAs advertise router interfaces within an area, whereas Type 3 LSAs are generated by an ABR to summarise routes between areas. This option is tempting because the advertising router (2.2.2.2) is a router, so one might assume it originates a router LSA, but the LS Type field explicitly identifies it as a summary link.
- ✗
The summary route is not installed because the metric is too high.
Why it's wrong here
The metric of 20 is normal and does not prevent installation.
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.