Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: An EIGRP network is experiencing a…

An EIGRP network is experiencing a stuck-in-active (SIA) condition for a route 192.168.1.0/24. R1 has the following configuration: router eigrp 100 network 10.0.0.0 distribute-list prefix PL-FILTER in. R2 shows: 'show ip eigrp topology 192.168.1.0/24' is in active state, and 'show ip eigrp events' shows that R1 sent a query but never received a reply. R1's prefix-list PL-FILTER permits only 10.0.0.0/8. What is the root cause?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The distribute-list inbound on R1 filters the EIGRP query for 192.168.1.0/24, preventing R1 from replying and causing SIA on R2.

The distribute-list prefix PL-FILTER in on R1 filters incoming routes, but it also affects queries. When R2 sends a query for 192.168.1.0/24, R1 receives it but the distribute-list filters the query (since the prefix is not permitted), so R1 does not process it and does not send a reply. This causes R2 to wait indefinitely for a reply, leading to an SIA condition. The distribute-list should be applied outbound or should permit the necessary prefixes to allow queries to be processed.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The distribute-list inbound on R1 filters the EIGRP query for 192.168.1.0/24, preventing R1 from replying and causing SIA on R2.

    Why this is correct

    EIGRP distribute-lists applied inbound also filter queries. Since the prefix 192.168.1.0/24 is not permitted by PL-FILTER, R1 drops the query and does not send a reply, leaving R2 in active state.

  • The EIGRP K-values are mismatched between R1 and R2.

    Why it's wrong here

    K-value mismatch would prevent adjacency formation, but the adjacency is up (since queries are sent).

  • The route 192.168.1.0/24 is not in R1's topology table, so it cannot reply.

    Why it's wrong here

    Even if the route is not in the topology table, R1 should reply with an unreachable message. The distribute-list blocks the query entirely.

  • The EIGRP timers on R1 are set too high, causing a delay in reply.

    Why it's wrong here

    Timer mismatch would not cause SIA if replies are sent; the issue is that no reply is sent at all.

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.