Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 VRF-Lite Practice Question

A network engineer is troubleshooting reachability issues in a VRF-lite environment. R1 has the following configuration: ip vrf BLUE rd 100:1 route-target export 100:1 route-target import 100:1. R2 has: ip vrf BLUE rd 100:2 route-target export 100:2 route-target import 100:2. Both routers are connected via a link in the global routing table and are running OSPF in the VRF. R1 shows: 'show ip route vrf BLUE' has a route to 10.1.1.0/24 via OSPF, but R2 shows: 'show ip route vrf BLUE' does not have this route. What is the root cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often confuse VRF-lite with MPLS L3VPN and assume route-target mismatch prevents route exchange, but in VRF-lite, OSPF over a link in the global table cannot form an adjacency within the VRF.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The link between R1 and R2 is not in the VRF, so OSPF cannot form adjacency.

In VRF-lite, OSPF adjacency requires the link to be in the VRF context. The configuration shows both routers have OSPF in the VRF, but the connecting link is in the global routing table, not in VRF BLUE. Therefore, OSPF cannot form an adjacency over that link, and routes learned via OSPF within the VRF on R1 are not propagated to R2. Route-target import/export is used for MP-BGP VPNv4 route distribution, not for OSPF in VRF-lite. The correct fix is to put the link in the VRF (e.g., using 'ip vrf forwarding BLUE' on the interface).

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The route-target export on R1 (100:1) does not match the route-target import on R2 (100:2), so R2 does not import routes from R1.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Route-target mismatch prevents MP-BGP route exchange in MPLS VPNs, but VRF-lite OSPF does not use route-targets for route propagation within the VRF.

  • The OSPF process on R1 is not configured with the 'vrf BLUE' keyword.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The 'vrf BLUE' keyword under router ospf is correctly implied; the issue is that the interface connecting the routers is not in the VRF.

  • The link between R1 and R2 is not in the VRF, so OSPF cannot form adjacency.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. The link between R1 and R2 is not part of VRF BLUE, so OSPF cannot form an adjacency in that VRF, preventing route learning.

  • The route 10.1.1.0/24 is being filtered by a distribute-list in OSPF.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. There is no indication of a distribute-list; the root cause is the missing VRF interface assignment, not filtering.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.