Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Runs the following command on Router R1: R1# show…

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip policy
Interface     Route-map

GigabitEthernet0/0 PBR-QOS

R1# show route-map PBR-QOS

route-map PBR-QOS, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address (access-lists): 120

Set clauses:

ip next-hop 10.0.0.2

Policy routing matches: 500 packets, 45000 bytes

R1# show access-lists 120

Extended IP access list 120

10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

R1# debug ip policy

Policy routing debugging is on

*Mar  1 00:05:23.123: IP: s=192.168.1.100 (GigabitEthernet0/0), d=8.8.8.8, len 100, policy match
*Mar  1 00:05:23.123: IP: s=192.168.1.100 (GigabitEthernet0/0), d=8.8.8.8, len 100, policy rejected

Based on this output, what is the most likely problem?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The next-hop 10.0.0.2 is unreachable.

The debug output shows 'policy match' followed by 'policy rejected'. This indicates that the packet matched the route map, but the set clause was not applied because the next-hop is unreachable or the route map's set condition fails (e.g., verify-availability if used, or next-hop not in routing table). The show route-map shows matches, but the packet is rejected and forwarded normally.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The next-hop 10.0.0.2 is unreachable.

    Why this is correct

    The debug 'policy rejected' after a match typically means the set next-hop is not reachable, so the packet is not policy-routed.

  • The access list 120 is misconfigured.

    Why it's wrong here

    The debug shows a policy match, so the ACL is working.

  • The route map is applied to the wrong interface.

    Why it's wrong here

    The debug shows packets arriving on GigabitEthernet0/0, which matches the interface where the route map is applied.

  • The route map sequence number is incorrect.

    Why it's wrong here

    Sequence numbers are fine; the match occurs.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more way this is tested on 300-410

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1: R1# show ip policy Interface Route-map GigabitEthernet0/0 PBR-VOICE R1# show route-map PBR-VOICE route-map PBR-VOICE, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): 130 Set clauses: ip next-hop 192.168.10.1 Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes R1# show access-lists 130 Extended IP access list 130 10 permit udp any any range 16384 32767 R1# show interfaces GigabitEthernet0/0 GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 10.1.1.1/24 R1# show ip route 192.168.10.1 % Network not in routing table Based on this output, what is the most likely problem?

medium
  • A.The access list 130 is not matching any traffic.
  • B.The next-hop 192.168.10.1 is not reachable.
  • C.The interface GigabitEthernet0/0 is down.
  • D.The route map is missing a permit statement.

Why B: The next-hop 192.168.10.1 is not in the routing table. For PBR to forward packets to a next-hop, that next-hop must be reachable (in the routing table). If it is not, packets that match the route map are forwarded using the normal routing table instead. The zero matches could be because no traffic matching ACL 130 has arrived, or because the next-hop is missing, but the missing route is a clear issue.

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.