Question 1,793 of 2,152
IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPFhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the ACL is applied outbound, but OSPFv3 packets are generated locally by the router and are not subject to outbound ACL filtering. In Cisco IOS, outbound ACLs only filter traffic that is routed through the interface, not traffic originated by the router itself, such as OSPFv3 hello packets sent to the multicast addresses ff02::5 and ff02::6. This is a common trap on the CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, where candidates assume an outbound ACL will block locally generated protocol traffic, but the router’s control plane bypasses outbound interface ACLs entirely. To filter OSPFv3 adjacency formation, the ACL must be applied inbound on the receiving interface, and it must correctly match protocol 89 using the `deny ospf` keyword rather than a numeric protocol number. Memory tip: think “local out, no doubt” — locally originated packets ignore outbound ACLs, so always apply the filter inbound to block OSPFv3.

300-410 IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPF Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ipv6 traffic filtering and urpf. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An engineer configures an IPv6 ACL to filter OSPFv3 traffic on a router interface. The ACL includes a deny entry for OSPFv3 (protocol 89) followed by a permit ipv6 any any. However, OSPFv3 adjacencies still fail to form over that interface. Which is the most likely explanation?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The ACL is applied outbound, but OSPFv3 packets are generated locally and are not subject to outbound ACL filtering.

OSPFv3 uses IPv6 multicast addresses ff02::5 (all OSPF routers) and ff02::6 (all DR/BDR routers). Even if an ACL permits OSPFv3 protocol, the multicast destination may be filtered by other mechanisms or the ACL may not be applied correctly. However, a common edge case is that the ACL is applied inbound and OSPFv3 packets are sourced from link-local addresses, which may not match the ACL source entry if not specified correctly. But the key point: OSPFv3 uses protocol 89 in the IPv6 header, but the ACL must match the protocol number, not the next header field in IPv6. In IOS, the 'ipv6 access-list' uses 'deny ospf' to match OSPFv3, but if the engineer uses 'deny 89' incorrectly, it may not match. The most likely issue: the ACL is applied outbound instead of inbound, or the deny entry incorrectly matches the OSPFv3 packets before the permit.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The ACL is applied outbound, but OSPFv3 packets are generated locally and are not subject to outbound ACL filtering.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Outbound ACLs do not filter locally generated packets, including OSPFv3 Hellos. The ACL must be applied inbound to filter incoming OSPFv3 packets.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The ACL uses 'deny ospf' but OSPFv3 uses protocol 89, which is not matched by 'deny ospf' in IPv6 ACLs.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. 'deny ospf' in IPv6 ACLs correctly matches OSPFv3 (protocol 89).

  • The ACL must include a permit entry for the link-local address of the neighbor, otherwise OSPFv3 packets are dropped.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. ACLs can match on source/destination addresses, but OSPFv3 uses link-local addresses; if the ACL permits ipv6 any any, it includes link-local.

  • The ACL is applied to the interface but the router has 'ipv6 ospf authentication' configured, which changes the packet format and bypasses ACL filtering.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Authentication does not bypass ACL filtering; ACLs are applied before authentication processing.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPF — This question tests IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPF — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The ACL is applied outbound, but OSPFv3 packets are generated locally and are not subject to outbound ACL filtering. — OSPFv3 uses IPv6 multicast addresses ff02::5 (all OSPF routers) and ff02::6 (all DR/BDR routers). Even if an ACL permits OSPFv3 protocol, the multicast destination may be filtered by other mechanisms or the ACL may not be applied correctly. However, a common edge case is that the ACL is applied inbound and OSPFv3 packets are sourced from link-local addresses, which may not match the ACL source entry if not specified correctly. But the key point: OSPFv3 uses protocol 89 in the IPv6 header, but the ACL must match the protocol number, not the next header field in IPv6. In IOS, the 'ipv6 access-list' uses 'deny ospf' to match OSPFv3, but if the engineer uses 'deny 89' incorrectly, it may not match. The most likely issue: the ACL is applied outbound instead of inbound, or the deny entry incorrectly matches the OSPFv3 packets before the permit.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.