Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: An engineer configures MPLS on a router with OSPF…

An engineer configures MPLS on a router with OSPF as the IGP. The OSPF neighbor is stuck in EXSTART state. The engineer verifies that both routers have matching MTU values on the connecting interfaces. What is the most likely cause of this issue?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The OSPF network type is mismatched between the two routers.

In OSPF, a neighbor stuck in EXSTART is often due to MTU mismatch, but if MTU is confirmed matching, the issue may be a mismatch in OSPF network type (e.g., one side broadcast, the other point-to-point). This causes different behavior in the Database Description (DD) packet exchange, leading to the stuck state even with matching MTU.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The OSPF network type is mismatched between the two routers.

    Why this is correct

    A mismatch in OSPF network type (e.g., broadcast vs point-to-point) can cause the neighbor to remain in EXSTART because the DD packet exchange process differs between network types, even if MTU is consistent.

  • The OSPF hello and dead intervals are mismatched.

    Why it's wrong here

    Mismatched hello/dead intervals prevent the neighbor from reaching the 2-WAY state, not EXSTART. The neighbor would not progress past INIT.

  • The router ID is duplicated on one of the routers.

    Why it's wrong here

    Duplicate router IDs cause OSPF to not form an adjacency at all, typically resulting in a state of DOWN or INIT, not EXSTART.

  • The interface is configured with 'ip ospf mtu-ignore' on one side only.

    Why it's wrong here

    Using 'ip ospf mtu-ignore' on one side only can cause a mismatch in DD packet handling, but if MTU is already matching, this is unnecessary and not the primary cause.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.