Question 603 of 2,152
IPsec Site-to-Site VPNhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that aggressive mode’s failure to negotiate ISAKMP SA lifetimes directly causes the tunnel instability. In IKEv1 aggressive mode, the responder’s configured lifetime is enforced without negotiation, so when one router has a lifetime of 86400 seconds and the other has 3600 seconds, the responder forces a re-key after one hour while the initiator still expects the longer duration. This mismatch in re-key timing leads to repeated tunnel drops and re-establishments. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this question tests your understanding of IKEv1 aggressive mode behavior versus main mode, where lifetimes are negotiated; a common trap is assuming both peers will agree on a lifetime. Remember the memory tip: “Aggressive mode is a dictator, not a diplomat—the responder’s lifetime always wins.”

300-410 IPsec Site-to-Site VPN Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ipsec site-to-site vpn. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An engineer configures an IPsec site-to-site VPN using IKEv1 with aggressive mode. The VPN tunnel establishes, but after some time, the tunnel goes down and re-establishes repeatedly. The engineer notices that the ISAKMP SA lifetime is set to 86400 seconds on one router and 3600 seconds on the other. What is the most likely explanation for the instability?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full VPN explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Aggressive mode does not negotiate ISAKMP SA lifetimes; the responder's lifetime is used, so the SA expires at different times, causing re-key failures.

In IKEv1 aggressive mode, the ISAKMP SA lifetime is not negotiated; the responder's configured lifetime is used. With lifetimes of 86400 seconds (24 hours) on one router and 3600 seconds (1 hour) on the other, the responder will enforce its own 3600-second lifetime. When the SA expires after 3600 seconds, the re-key occurs, but the initiator still expects the longer lifetime, causing a mismatch in the re-key timing and leading to repeated tunnel drops and re-establishments.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Aggressive mode does not negotiate ISAKMP SA lifetimes; the responder's lifetime is used, so the SA expires at different times, causing re-key failures.

    Why this is correct

    In aggressive mode, the initiator sends its proposal, but the responder's lifetime is used for the SA. If the lifetimes differ, the SA will expire on one side first, causing the tunnel to drop and re-establish.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The IPsec transform set uses ESP with null encryption, which is incompatible with aggressive mode.

    Why it's wrong here

    Null encryption is supported in aggressive mode; this would not cause tunnel instability.

  • The ISAKMP SA lifetime mismatch causes the IPsec SA to be re-keyed with different parameters, leading to a transform set mismatch.

    Why it's wrong here

    The IPsec SA parameters are negotiated separately; lifetime mismatch affects only the ISAKMP SA.

  • Aggressive mode requires pre-shared keys to be identical, and a mismatch causes the tunnel to drop after the first re-key.

    Why it's wrong here

    Pre-shared key mismatch would prevent the tunnel from establishing initially.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the subtle difference that aggressive mode does not negotiate ISAKMP SA lifetimes, so candidates mistakenly assume both sides must match or that the mismatch only affects phase 2, when in fact the responder's lifetime is used unilaterally, causing re-key timing issues.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

IKEv1 aggressive mode uses fewer exchanges (3 packets) than main mode (6 packets) and does not include the ISAKMP SA lifetime in the negotiation; the responder's lifetime is silently accepted. This behavior is documented in RFC 2409, where the lifetime attribute is optional in aggressive mode. In real-world deployments, mismatched lifetimes can cause the IKE SA to expire on one side while the other still considers it valid, leading to re-key failures and tunnel flapping until the administrator aligns the lifetimes.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

IPsec Site-to-Site VPN — This question tests IPsec Site-to-Site VPN — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Aggressive mode does not negotiate ISAKMP SA lifetimes; the responder's lifetime is used, so the SA expires at different times, causing re-key failures. — In IKEv1 aggressive mode, the ISAKMP SA lifetime is not negotiated; the responder's configured lifetime is used. With lifetimes of 86400 seconds (24 hours) on one router and 3600 seconds (1 hour) on the other, the responder will enforce its own 3600-second lifetime. When the SA expires after 3600 seconds, the re-key occurs, but the initiator still expects the longer lifetime, causing a mismatch in the re-key timing and leading to repeated tunnel drops and re-establishments.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.