mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
300-410 Practice Question: Runs the following command to troubleshoot an EEM…
A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an EEM issue:
R1# show event manager policy configuration TRACK-INTERFACE
Applet TRACK-INTERFACE event syslog pattern "OSPF-5-ADJCHG" action 1.0 cli command "show ip route" action 2.0 cli command "show ip ospf neighbor" action 3.0 syslog msg "OSPF adjacency change detected"
What does this output indicate?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The applet 'TRACK-INTERFACE' is configured to trigger on syslog message 'OSPF-5-ADJCHG' and execute three actions in order: show ip route, show ip ospf neighbor, and send a syslog message.
The output shows the configuration of a specific EEM applet. It displays the event trigger and the actions in order. Each action has a step number (e.g., 1.0) that determines the order of execution. This is useful for verifying the applet configuration.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The applet 'TRACK-INTERFACE' is configured to trigger on syslog message 'OSPF-5-ADJCHG' and execute three actions in order: show ip route, show ip ospf neighbor, and send a syslog message.
Why this is correct
Correct. The output shows the event and three actions with step numbers indicating order.
- ✗
The applet 'TRACK-INTERFACE' is currently executing and has run the first two actions.
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. This shows the configuration, not the execution state.
- ✗
The applet 'TRACK-INTERFACE' has a syntax error because the actions are not numbered correctly.
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. The step numbers 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 are valid EEM action numbering.
- ✗
The applet 'TRACK-INTERFACE' will only execute the first action because the others are commented out.
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. All three actions are listed without any comment indicators.
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,966-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.