Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 DMVPN Phase 2 Practice Question

In a DMVPN Phase 2 network with EIGRP, R1 (hub) and R2 (spoke) are configured with EIGRP stub leaking. R2 is a stub router with 'eigrp stub connected summary'. R3 (another spoke) is not a stub. R2's loopback 10.0.0.1/32 is not reachable from R3, even though R2 advertises it via EIGRP. What is the root cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often overlook the necessity of NHRP in DMVPN Phase 2 when focusing on EIGRP stub configuration. Even with proper stub leaking, a spoke without NHRP will prevent other spokes from routing to its networks.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

NHRP is not configured on R2, preventing route advertisement.

In DMVPN Phase 2, EIGRP stub leaking allows the hub to advertise spoke routes to other spokes, but the next-hop remains the spoke's tunnel IP. For R3 to install the route to 10.0.0.1/32, it must have an NHRP mapping to reach R2's tunnel IP. Without NHRP configured on R2, R3 cannot resolve the next-hop, making the route unreachable. The EIGRP stub configuration is correct, but NHRP is missing.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • R2 is configured with 'eigrp stub receive-only', which prevents it from advertising any routes, including connected ones.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The stem explicitly states that R2 is configured with 'eigrp stub connected summary', not 'receive-only'. 'Receive-only' would contradict the given configuration.

  • R3 has a distribute-list filtering the prefix 10.0.0.1/32 from EIGRP updates.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. There is no evidence of a distribute-list on R3; the question does not mention any filtering. The issue is likely network-layer reachability, not filtering.

  • R2's loopback is not in the same EIGRP autonomous system as the tunnel.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The stem states that R2 advertises the loopback via EIGRP, meaning it is in the same autonomous system. If it were not, the route would not be advertised at all.

  • NHRP is not configured on R2, preventing route advertisement.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Without NHRP on R2, R3 cannot resolve R2's tunnel IP to a physical address, so the route to 10.0.0.1/32 remains unreachable despite being advertised.

Visual reference

Client Recursive Resolver Root DNS (13 root servers) TLD DNS (.com, .org, …) Authoritative example.com query IP addr answer

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,966-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.