mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
300-410 Practice Question: Runs the following command on Router R1: R1# show…
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip dhcp snooping binding
MacAddress IpAddress Lease(sec) Type VLAN Interface AA:BB:CC:01:02:03 192.168.1.10 86400 dhcp-snooping 10 GigabitEthernet0/1 AA:BB:CC:01:02:04 192.168.1.11 86400 dhcp-snooping 10 GigabitEthernet0/1 AA:BB:CC:01:02:05 192.168.1.12 86400 dhcp-snooping 10 GigabitEthernet0/2
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
⚠ Common exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that multiple DHCP clients on the same interface indicate a conflict or misconfiguration, but DHCP snooping bindings can legitimately show multiple entries per interface as long as they are in the same VLAN and have unique MAC/IP pairs.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
DHCP snooping is enabled and has recorded bindings for three clients.
The output shows three DHCP snooping bindings with MAC addresses, IP addresses, lease times, and associated VLANs and interfaces, which indicates that DHCP snooping is enabled and has successfully recorded these bindings for clients. The 'dhcp-snooping' type confirms these are dynamically learned from DHCP messages, and the presence of multiple clients on the same interface (GigabitEthernet0/1) is valid as long as they are on the same VLAN.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
DHCP snooping is enabled and has recorded bindings for three clients.
Why this is correct
The table shows valid bindings.
- ✗
DHCP snooping has detected a rogue DHCP server on GigabitEthernet0/1.
Why it's wrong here
No indication of a rogue server.
- ✗
DHCP snooping is not functioning because the bindings are not trusted.
Why it's wrong here
Bindings are recorded; trust is per interface.
- ✗
DHCP snooping has a conflict because two clients are on the same interface.
Why it's wrong here
Multiple clients on the same interface is normal.
Visual reference
Quick reference
Common DNS Record Types
| Record | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A | IPv4 address mapping | example.com → 93.184.216.34 |
| AAAA | IPv6 address mapping | example.com → 2606:2800::1 |
| CNAME | Alias to another hostname | www → example.com |
| MX | Mail server for domain | example.com → mail.example.com (priority 10) |
| TXT | Text data (SPF, DKIM, verification) | v=spf1 include:_spf.example.com ~all |
| NS | Authoritative name servers | example.com NS ns1.example.com |
| PTR | Reverse DNS (IP → hostname) | 34.216.184.93.in-addr.arpa → example.com |
| SOA | Zone authority record | Primary NS, admin email, serial, TTL defaults |
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.