mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
300-410 Practice Question: Given the following partial configuration on…
Given the following partial configuration on router R5:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip pim sparse-mode
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 10.2.2.1 255.255.255.0 ip pim sparse-mode
!
router ospf 1
router-id 5.5.5.5
network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0
What is the effect of this configuration?
⚠ Common exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that enabling PIM sparse-mode on an interface disrupts OSPF adjacency formation, when in fact they operate at different layers (OSPF at Layer 3 routing, PIM at multicast routing) and do not interfere with each other.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
OSPF will form adjacencies on both interfaces, and PIM sparse-mode will operate normally; the configuration is valid.
The configuration is valid because OSPF and PIM sparse-mode operate independently on an interface. OSPF uses multicast address 224.0.0.5/6 for hello packets and forms adjacencies regardless of PIM sparse-mode being enabled. PIM sparse-mode requires an RP to function, but its presence does not affect OSPF adjacency formation. The network statement 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 matches both interfaces (10.1.1.1 and 10.2.2.1), so OSPF will form adjacencies on both.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
OSPF will not form adjacencies because PIM sparse-mode is enabled on the interfaces.
Why it's wrong here
OSPF and PIM can coexist on the same interface. PIM does not interfere with OSPF adjacency formation.
- ✓
OSPF will form adjacencies on both interfaces, and PIM sparse-mode will operate normally; the configuration is valid.
Why this is correct
Both protocols work together. OSPF handles unicast routing, PIM handles multicast. No issues.
- ✗
OSPF will only form adjacency on GigabitEthernet0/0 because the network statement does not match GigabitEthernet0/1.
Why it's wrong here
The network statement 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 matches both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.2.2.0/24.
- ✗
PIM sparse-mode will not work because there is no rendezvous point (RP) configured.
Why it's wrong here
PIM sparse-mode can operate without a statically configured RP if dynamic RP discovery (e.g., Auto-RP or BSR) is used, or if the RP is learned via other means. The absence of an RP does not prevent PIM from operating, but multicast forwarding may be limited.
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,966-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.