Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 R1 and R2 are iBGP peers Practice Question

R1 and R2 are iBGP peers. R1 has: neighbor 10.1.1.2 route-map RM_SET in. The route-map RM_SET sets community 100:100. R2 advertises a prefix 172.16.1.0/24 with community 200:200. R1 receives the prefix and the community is changed to 100:100. However, R1's BGP table shows the prefix with community 100:100, but R1 does not propagate this prefix to its other iBGP peer R3. R3 has no special configuration. What is the root cause?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

iBGP split-horizon rule prevents R1 from advertising routes learned from an iBGP peer to another iBGP peer.

By default, iBGP learned routes are not advertised to other iBGP peers to prevent loops, unless the router is a route reflector or confederation. R1 is not a route reflector, so it will not advertise the prefix learned from R2 to R3. The community manipulation is irrelevant to the propagation issue. The root cause is that iBGP split-horizon prevents R1 from advertising the prefix to R3.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • iBGP split-horizon rule prevents R1 from advertising routes learned from an iBGP peer to another iBGP peer.

    Why this is correct

    iBGP does not advertise routes learned from one iBGP neighbor to another iBGP neighbor unless route reflection or confederation is used.

  • The community 100:100 is being filtered by R3's inbound policy.

    Why it's wrong here

    R3 has no special configuration, so no filtering.

  • The route-map RM_SET should have been applied outbound on R2 instead.

    Why it's wrong here

    The community is set correctly, but propagation is the issue.

  • R1 must have a network statement for 172.16.1.0/24 to advertise it.

    Why it's wrong here

    Network statements are for originating routes, not for propagating learned routes.

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.