Question 481 of 500
MPLS and Segment RoutingmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The most likely cause is that LDP is not enabled on the interface toward 192.168.3.3. When LDP is disabled on the outgoing interface, the router cannot establish a label-switched path with the next-hop neighbor, so it never receives a label binding for the prefix 10.4.4.0/24. Without an incoming label-to-outgoing label mapping, the MPLS forwarding table shows 'Untagged' in the outgoing label column, meaning the router must pop the label and forward the packet as a standard IP packet. On the Cisco SPCOR 350-501 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the MPLS label distribution process and the relationship between the LIB and LFIB. A common trap is assuming 'Untagged' indicates a misconfiguration of the local label itself, when in fact the issue is the missing LDP session on the egress interface. Memory tip: no LDP neighbor, no label swap—only a pop.

350-501 MPLS and Segment Routing Practice Question

This 350-501 practice question tests your understanding of mpls and segment routing. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

PE1# show mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing    Prefix           Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label       or Tunnel Id     Switched      interface
16     Pop Label   10.1.1.0/24      0             Gi0/0/0    192.168.1.1
17     18          10.2.2.0/24      0             Gi0/0/1    192.168.2.2
18     19          10.3.3.0/24      0             Gi0/0/1    192.168.2.2
19     Untagged    10.4.4.0/24      0             Gi0/0/2    192.168.3.3

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer notices that the local label 19 for prefix 10.4.4.0/24 shows 'Untagged' in the outgoing label column. What is the most likely cause?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

PE1# show mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing    Prefix           Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label       or Tunnel Id     Switched      interface
16     Pop Label   10.1.1.0/24      0             Gi0/0/0    192.168.1.1
17     18          10.2.2.0/24      0             Gi0/0/1    192.168.2.2
18     19          10.3.3.0/24      0             Gi0/0/1    192.168.2.2
19     Untagged    10.4.4.0/24      0             Gi0/0/2    192.168.3.3

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

LDP is not enabled on the interface toward 192.168.3.3.

When LDP is not enabled on the interface toward the next-hop router (192.168.3.3), the local router cannot exchange label bindings with that neighbor. As a result, the local label for prefix 10.4.4.0/24 remains in the LIB but is not programmed into the LFIB with an outgoing label, showing 'Untagged' because the router must pop the label (or forward as IP) when sending traffic to that next hop.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The next-hop router 192.168.3.3 is unreachable.

    Why it's wrong here

    If unreachable, the entry would not be in the LFIB.

  • Penultimate Hop Popping is enabled on the next-hop router.

    Why it's wrong here

    PHP would show 'Pop Label', not 'Untagged'.

  • The MTU on interface Gi0/0/2 is too small.

    Why it's wrong here

    MTU does not affect label assignment.

  • LDP is not enabled on the interface toward 192.168.3.3.

    Why this is correct

    If LDP is not enabled, no label is received from the next-hop, resulting in 'Untagged'.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between 'Untagged' (no label from LDP neighbor) and 'Pop tag' (implicit-null from PHP), leading candidates to mistakenly attribute 'Untagged' to PHP when it actually indicates a missing LDP adjacency.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    PHP would show 'Pop Label', not 'Untagged'.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

LDP uses UDP for discovery (hello messages on port 646) and TCP for session establishment and label exchange. If LDP is disabled on an interface (e.g., via 'no mpls ip' under the interface), the router will not form an LDP adjacency with the neighbor, so no label bindings are received for that next hop. In the LFIB, 'Untagged' indicates that the router must perform IP lookup (or impose a label based on a different LDP session) rather than swapping labels, which can lead to suboptimal forwarding or MPLS path failure in a full LSP.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 350-501 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-501 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-501 question test?

MPLS and Segment Routing — This question tests MPLS and Segment Routing — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: LDP is not enabled on the interface toward 192.168.3.3. — When LDP is not enabled on the interface toward the next-hop router (192.168.3.3), the local router cannot exchange label bindings with that neighbor. As a result, the local label for prefix 10.4.4.0/24 remains in the LIB but is not programmed into the LFIB with an outgoing label, showing 'Untagged' because the router must pop the label (or forward as IP) when sending traffic to that next hop.

What should I do if I get this 350-501 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on 350-501

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. An engineer notices that MPLS VPN traffic is taking a suboptimal path because the MPLS label binding for the BGP next-hop loopback is missing. What is the most likely cause?

easy
  • A.The remote PE is configured with a different VPN ID.
  • B.The local PE does not have a route to its own loopback.
  • C.LDP is not enabled on the core-facing interfaces.
  • D.LDP is not enabled on the PE-CE interface.

Why C: LDP must be enabled on core-facing interfaces to distribute labels for the loopback. If it is missing, no label is available.

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.