- A
OSPF Type 7 LSAs
Why wrong: Type 7 are NSSA external LSAs.
- B
OSPF Type 11 Opaque LSAs
Why wrong: Type 11 is for external scope, but TE uses area scope (Type 10).
- C
OSPF Type 10 Opaque LSAs
Correct. Type 10 Opaque LSAs carry TE information.
- D
OSPF Type 5 LSAs
Why wrong: Type 5 are external LSAs, not for TE.
Question 816 of 1,000
350-501 Networking Practice Question
This 350-501 practice question tests your understanding of networking. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
An SP network uses OSPF with RSVP-TE for traffic engineering. Which OSPF extension is required to advertise TE link parameters such as maximum reservable bandwidth?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
OSPF Type 10 Opaque LSAs
OSPF TE extensions are defined in RFC 3630, which introduces the Opaque LSA (Type 9, 10, 11). Specifically, Type 10 Opaque LSAs carry TE information. The TE LSA is carried in an Opaque LSA of area scope (Type 10).
Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
OSPF Type 7 LSAs
Why it's wrong here
Type 7 are NSSA external LSAs.
- ✗
OSPF Type 11 Opaque LSAs
Why it's wrong here
Type 11 is for external scope, but TE uses area scope (Type 10).
- ✓
OSPF Type 10 Opaque LSAs
Why this is correct
Correct. Type 10 Opaque LSAs carry TE information.
Related concept
OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
- ✗
OSPF Type 5 LSAs
Why it's wrong here
Type 5 are external LSAs, not for TE.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct
OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
- Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
- OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
- A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.
TExam Day Tips
- Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
- Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
- Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.
Key takeaway
OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 350-501 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.
- →
Networking — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Networking practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All 350-501 questions
1,000 questions across all exam domains
- →
Cisco SPCOR / CCNP Service Provider Core 350-501 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
350-501 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related 350-501 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
MPLS and Segment Routing practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to MPLS and Segment Routing.
Automation and Quality of Services practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Automation and Quality of Services.
Architecture practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Architecture.
Networking practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Networking.
Security and Services practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Security and Services.
Automation and Quality of Service practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Automation and Quality of Service.
Services practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Services.
Automation and Assurance practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Automation and Assurance.
350-501 fundamentals practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to 350-501 fundamentals.
350-501 scenario practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to 350-501 scenario.
350-501 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to 350-501 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free 350-501 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this 350-501 question test?
Networking — This question tests Networking — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: OSPF Type 10 Opaque LSAs — OSPF TE extensions are defined in RFC 3630, which introduces the Opaque LSA (Type 9, 10, 11). Specifically, Type 10 Opaque LSAs carry TE information. The TE LSA is carried in an Opaque LSA of area scope (Type 10).
What should I do if I get this 350-501 question wrong?
Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 350-501 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.
What is the key concept behind this question?
OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026
This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.