Courseiva
MPLS and Segment RoutingeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-501 MPLS and Segment Routing Practice Question

A network engineer is designing an MPLS core using Segment Routing. They want to minimize label stack depth while still providing fast convergence using TI-LFA. Which prefix-SID assignment strategy should be used?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the misconception that node-SIDs (loopbacks) are sufficient for TI-LFA, but the trap is that TI-LFA requires prefix-SIDs for all prefixes to achieve optimal label stack depth and fast convergence, as node-SIDs alone may force deeper stacks or suboptimal backup paths.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Advertise prefix-SIDs for all IGP prefixes

Advertising prefix-SIDs for all IGP prefixes allows TI-LFA to compute backup paths using any prefix in the network, not just loopbacks. This minimizes label stack depth by enabling TI-LFA to use a single prefix-SID for the repair path, avoiding the need for additional labels or explicit path constructs. Fast convergence is achieved because TI-LFA precomputes a backup next-hop that can be activated immediately upon failure, and having all prefixes as SIDs ensures the backup path can be expressed with minimal label imposition.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Assign a node-SID to each loopback interface

    Why it's wrong here

    Node-SID is typical, but the question is about minimizing label stack while using TI-LFA.

  • Use per-interface label mode from SRGB

    Why it's wrong here

    Interface-based labels increase stack depth.

  • Allocate labels per-VRF on PE routers

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF labels are for VPN, not transport.

  • Advertise prefix-SIDs for all IGP prefixes

    Why this is correct

    Prefix-SIDs enable TI-LFA with minimal label depth.

About these practice questions

This 350-501 question is part of Courseiva's 971-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.