Question 439 of 1,000
NetworkmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-601 Network Practice Question

This 350-601 practice question tests your understanding of network. Compare every option against the stated constraints before choosing — the best answer satisfies all requirements, not just the most obvious one. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An engineer is configuring OSPF on a Nexus 9000 switch in a data center spine-leaf topology. Which OSPF network type is most appropriate on the point-to-point links between leaf and spine switches to ensure fast convergence?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

point-to-point

In a spine-leaf topology, the links between leaf and spine switches are typically point-to-point, even if they are Ethernet interfaces. Configuring the OSPF network type as point-to-point on these links eliminates the need for a Designated Router (DR) and Backup Designated Router (BDR) election, which reduces OSPF adjacency formation time and ensures faster convergence. This network type also allows OSPF to use multicast hello packets (224.0.0.5) without the overhead of a DR/BDR election, making it the most appropriate choice for fast convergence.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • broadcast

    Why it's wrong here

    Broadcast requires DR/BDR election and is slower on point-to-point links.

  • point-to-multipoint

    Why it's wrong here

    Point-to-multipoint is used when one interface connects to multiple, not for direct spine-leaf.

  • point-to-point

    Why this is correct

    Point-to-point is optimal for direct links, avoids DR/BDR.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • non-broadcast

    Why it's wrong here

    Non-broadcast is used for NBMA networks, not point-to-point.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the misconception that 'broadcast' is the default and therefore acceptable for all Ethernet links, but the trap here is that candidates overlook the DR/BDR election overhead on point-to-point links, which directly impacts convergence time in a spine-leaf design.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, OSPF point-to-point network type sets the OSPF interface to use a /32 host route for the neighbor's router ID, which speeds up the SPF calculation and reduces the Link State Advertisement (LSA) overhead. Additionally, it disables the wait timer and the DR/BDR election process, allowing the adjacency to form immediately after the 2-way state is reached, which is critical in a spine-leaf topology where rapid failover is expected. In real-world deployments, this is often configured with the 'ip ospf network point-to-point' interface command, and it pairs well with Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for sub-second convergence.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 350-601 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-601 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-601 question test?

Network — This question tests Network — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: point-to-point — In a spine-leaf topology, the links between leaf and spine switches are typically point-to-point, even if they are Ethernet interfaces. Configuring the OSPF network type as point-to-point on these links eliminates the need for a Designated Router (DR) and Backup Designated Router (BDR) election, which reduces OSPF adjacency formation time and ensures faster convergence. This network type also allows OSPF to use multicast hello packets (224.0.0.5) without the overhead of a DR/BDR election, making it the most appropriate choice for fast convergence.

What should I do if I get this 350-601 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 350-601 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-601 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-601 exam.