easymultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Which OSPF neighbor state indicates that the routers have already exchanged full link-state databases?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Which OSPF neighbor state indicates that the routers have already exchanged full link-state databases?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

2-WAY

2-WAY means bidirectional hellos, but not full database exchange.

B

Distractor review

EXSTART

EXSTART is the master-slave negotiation stage.

C

Best answer

FULL

FULL indicates the neighbors are fully adjacent.

D

Distractor review

INIT

INIT means a hello was seen, but bidirectional communication is not confirmed yet.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

A frequent exam trap is selecting the 2-WAY or EXSTART states as the answer because they represent important steps in OSPF neighbor formation. However, 2-WAY only confirms bidirectional hello packets without database exchange, and EXSTART is merely the negotiation phase for database synchronization. Choosing these states overlooks the fact that full link-state database exchange and adjacency completion only occur at the FULL state. Misunderstanding this can lead to incorrect assumptions about OSPF neighbor readiness and routing stability.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a link-state routing protocol that establishes neighbor relationships through a series of defined states. These states represent the progress of adjacency formation and database synchronization between routers. The process begins with the INIT state, where a router detects a hello packet from a neighbor but has not yet confirmed bidirectional communication. It then moves to the 2-WAY state, confirming bidirectional communication but not yet exchanging routing information. The EXSTART state follows, where routers negotiate master-slave roles to coordinate the database exchange process. The critical state for full adjacency is the FULL state, which signifies that both routers have successfully exchanged their entire link-state databases and are synchronized. This state ensures that both routers have identical topology information, allowing them to make consistent and accurate routing decisions. The transition through these states is essential for OSPF's reliable operation, as it prevents routing loops and inconsistencies by confirming database synchronization before forwarding traffic. A common exam trap is confusing the 2-WAY or EXSTART states with FULL. While 2-WAY confirms bidirectional communication and EXSTART initiates database exchange, neither guarantees complete synchronization. In practical networking, routers in the FULL state can immediately forward traffic based on the synchronized database, whereas routers in earlier states cannot. Understanding these distinctions is vital for troubleshooting OSPF adjacencies and ensuring network stability.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbors progress through specific states during adjacency formation, culminating in the FULL state when link-state databases are fully synchronized.
  • The FULL state in OSPF indicates that routers have completed the exchange of their entire link-state databases and are fully adjacent.
  • OSPF uses a master-slave relationship during the EXSTART state to negotiate the initial sequence number for database exchange.
  • The INIT state in OSPF means a router has received a hello packet but has not yet confirmed bidirectional communication with the neighbor.
  • The 2-WAY state in OSPF confirms bidirectional communication but does not guarantee full database synchronization.
  • OSPF adjacency states ensure reliable and consistent routing information by controlling the database exchange process step-by-step.
  • Routers in the FULL state can forward traffic based on the synchronized link-state database, ensuring accurate routing decisions.
  • Understanding OSPF neighbor states helps prevent misinterpretation of adjacency status and supports troubleshooting routing issues effectively.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

OSPF neighbors progress through specific states during adjacency formation, culminating in the FULL state when link-state databases are fully synchronized.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: FULL — FULL means the adjacency is complete and database synchronization has finished. States such as INIT, 2-WAY, EXSTART, and EXCHANGE all occur earlier in the process.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.