Question 1,461 of 1,819
Network Services and SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Services and Security Practice Question

This 200-301 practice question tests your understanding of network services and security. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. A key principle to apply: an extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control.. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Requirement:
Allow 10.1.10.0/24 to reach 198.51.100.20 on TCP ports 80 and 443 only.
Block all other traffic from 10.1.10.0/24.

An administrator wants to permit HTTP and HTTPS from 10.1.10.0/24 to a web server at 198.51.100.20 and deny everything else from that subnet. Which ACL type is required?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Study the full ACL explanation →

Exhibit

Requirement:
Allow 10.1.10.0/24 to reach 198.51.100.20 on TCP ports 80 and 443 only.
Block all other traffic from 10.1.10.0/24.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Extended ACL

A standard ACL can match only the source address. To permit specific protocols and ports such as TCP 80 and 443 to a specific destination, the administrator must use an extended ACL.

Key principle: An extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Named standard ACL

    Why it's wrong here

    Distractor.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different scenario where the requirement is to permit all traffic from a specific source IP address to any destination without specifying protocols or ports, a named standard ACL would be appropriate. For example, if the question asked to allow all traffic from 10.1.10.0/24 to any destination, a named standard ACL would suffice.

  • Extended ACL

    Why this is correct

    Correct choice.

    Related concept

    An extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control.

  • Prefix list

    Why it's wrong here

    Distractor.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the exam question asked about filtering routes for a specific subnet to control which networks can be advertised or learned, a prefix list would be the correct answer. For example, a question might ask how to allow only certain subnets to be advertised to a routing protocol.

  • MAC access-list

    Why it's wrong here

    Distractor.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question were to ask about filtering traffic based on MAC addresses within a local network segment, such as allowing specific devices to communicate while blocking others, then a MAC access-list would be the correct choice.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Extended ACLCorrect answer

Why this is correct

Correct choice.

Named standard ACLWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A named standard ACL cannot filter traffic based on IP protocols or specific ports, which is necessary for allowing HTTP and HTTPS traffic. This option is incorrect because it does not meet the requirement of permitting specific services to a destination IP.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different scenario where the requirement is to permit all traffic from a specific source IP address to any destination without specifying protocols or ports, a named standard ACL would be appropriate. For example, if the question asked to allow all traffic from 10.1.10.0/24 to any destination, a named standard ACL would suffice.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option due to familiarity with standard ACLs and their use in controlling traffic based on source IP addresses, leading them to overlook the need for protocol and port specificity in this case.

Prefix listWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A prefix list is used for filtering routes based on IP prefixes and is not applicable for controlling traffic based on protocols or ports, which is required in this scenario for allowing HTTP and HTTPS traffic.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the exam question asked about filtering routes for a specific subnet to control which networks can be advertised or learned, a prefix list would be the correct answer. For example, a question might ask how to allow only certain subnets to be advertised to a routing protocol.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse prefix lists with access control lists due to their similar purpose in network management, leading them to mistakenly believe that prefix lists can also handle traffic filtering based on protocols and ports.

MAC access-listWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A MAC access-list is used to filter traffic based on MAC addresses at Layer 2 of the OSI model, which is not applicable for controlling HTTP and HTTPS traffic that operates at Layer 7. The question specifies IP addresses and protocols, making MAC access-lists irrelevant.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question were to ask about filtering traffic based on MAC addresses within a local network segment, such as allowing specific devices to communicate while blocking others, then a MAC access-list would be the correct choice.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse MAC access-lists with other types of access control lists due to their general understanding of network security, leading them to incorrectly assume that MAC filtering could apply to IP-based protocols like HTTP and HTTPS.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

A frequent exam trap is selecting a standard ACL when the question requires filtering by both source and destination IP addresses plus specific protocols or ports. Standard ACLs only filter by source IP, so they cannot distinguish HTTP or HTTPS traffic to a particular destination. Another trap is confusing prefix lists or MAC access-lists as suitable options; prefix lists filter routes, not traffic by port, and MAC access-lists filter Layer 2 addresses, not Layer 3 or 4 information. Misunderstanding these differences leads to incorrect ACL type selection and exam failure.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Access Control Lists (ACLs) are fundamental tools in Cisco networking used to filter traffic based on defined criteria. Standard ACLs filter traffic solely by the source IP address, making them suitable for broad filtering but insufficient for granular control. Extended ACLs, however, allow filtering by source and destination IP addresses, protocol types (such as TCP or UDP), and specific port numbers, enabling precise control over which traffic is permitted or denied. In this scenario, the administrator needs to permit HTTP (TCP port 80) and HTTPS (TCP port 443) traffic from the subnet 10.1.10.0/24 to a specific web server at 198.51.100.20, while denying all other traffic from that subnet. This requirement demands filtering based on both source and destination IP addresses and specific TCP ports, which only an extended ACL can provide. The ACL must explicitly permit TCP traffic to ports 80 and 443 on the destination IP and then deny all other traffic from the source subnet. A common exam trap is confusing standard ACLs with extended ACLs, assuming standard ACLs can filter by destination or port. Additionally, prefix lists and MAC access-lists serve different purposes and cannot filter by TCP ports or specific IP destinations. Practically, applying an extended ACL closest to the traffic source optimizes network security and performance by blocking unwanted traffic early. Understanding these distinctions is critical for correct ACL implementation and passing the CCNA exam.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • An extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control.
  • A standard ACL filters traffic only by source IP address, lacking the ability to specify destination addresses or protocols like TCP ports 80 and 443.
  • Cisco routers process ACLs sequentially, stopping at the first matching rule, so rule order is critical to correctly permit or deny traffic.
  • Extended ACLs are typically applied closest to the source of the traffic to reduce unnecessary traffic on the network and improve security.
  • ACLs implicitly deny all traffic that does not match any permit statement, so an explicit deny is often unnecessary but can improve clarity.
  • Named ACLs provide easier management and editing but do not change the fundamental filtering capabilities compared to numbered ACLs.
  • Prefix lists filter based on IP address prefixes and are primarily used in routing policy control, not for protocol or port-based filtering.
  • MAC access-lists filter traffic based on Layer 2 MAC addresses and are not suitable for IP protocol or port filtering required in this scenario.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

An extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review an extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control., then practise related 200-301 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-301 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

Network Services and Security — This question tests Network Services and Security — An extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Extended ACL — A standard ACL can match only the source address. To permit specific protocols and ports such as TCP 80 and 443 to a specific destination, the administrator must use an extended ACL.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Review an extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control., then practise related 200-301 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

What is the key concept behind this question?

An extended ACL permits filtering based on source and destination IP addresses, as well as protocol types and port numbers, enabling precise traffic control.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 200-301 practice questions

Last reviewed: May 17, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.