Question 1,530 of 1,819
Network Infrastructure and ConnectivityhardTroubleshootingObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is to configure the interface with 'duplex auto' and 'speed auto'. This resolves the CRC errors because, on a GigabitEthernet link operating at 1000 Mb/s, half-duplex is not supported by the 1000BASE-T standard, so a traditional duplex mismatch is impossible; instead, the high CRC errors indicate a negotiation mismatch where one side is using forced settings while the other is set to auto-negotiation, causing physical-layer instability and frame corruption. On the CCNA 200-301 v2 exam, this scenario tests your understanding that auto-negotiation is mandatory for Gigabit Ethernet to establish a stable link, and a common trap is assuming "full-duplex" and "1000 Mb/s" in the show output means the link is healthy—when in fact, forced settings can still show those values while generating errors. A key memory tip: at Gigabit, always trust auto, never force—if you see CRC errors on a 1000BASE-T link, the fix is to let both sides negotiate.

CCNA Network Infrastructure and Connectivity Practice Question

This 200-301 practice question tests your understanding of network infrastructure and connectivity. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Network Topology
G0/010.0.0.1/30G0/010.0.0.2/30linkR1R2

You are connected to R1 via the console. The link between R1 and R2 is experiencing intermittent connectivity. A 'show interfaces GigabitEthernet0/0' output shows the interface is up/up, line protocol up, Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, but there are 1234 input errors, including 567 CRC errors. Identify the root cause of the issue, and apply the necessary configuration fix to restore full connectivity.

Question 1hardTroubleshooting
Full question →

Exhibit

R1# show interfaces gigabitethernet 0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is aabb.cc00.0101 (bia aabb.cc00.0101)
  Internet address is 10.0.0.1/30
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is RJ45
  output flow-control is unsupported, input flow-control is unsupported
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     5123 packets input, 456789 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 2345 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     1234 input errors, 567 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     7890 packets output, 123456 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Configure the interface with 'duplex auto' and 'speed auto'.

The output indicates high CRC errors on a GigabitEthernet interface operating at 1000 Mb/s and full-duplex. Since 1000BASE-T does not support half-duplex, a duplex mismatch is not possible. The CRC errors likely result from a speed or duplex negotiation mismatch where one side uses forced settings (e.g., speed 1000 duplex full) and the other uses auto-negotiation, causing physical layer instability. Setting both sides to auto-negotiation ('duplex auto' and 'speed auto') allows them to properly agree on the highest common speed and duplex, resolving the errors. Option A forces full and 1000, which may not match R2 if it is set to auto, so it is not a reliable fix. Option B uses 'duplex half', which is invalid on Gigabit links and would break connectivity. Option C's 'no shutdown' is irrelevant because the interface is already administratively up.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Configure the interface with 'duplex full' and 'speed 1000'.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is incorrect because forcing full-duplex and 1000 Mbps on R1 does not resolve the mismatch if R2 is set to half-duplex. The mismatch persists, causing continued CRC errors.

  • Configure the interface with 'duplex half' and 'speed 100'.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is incorrect because reducing speed and setting half-duplex may reduce errors but does not address the root cause of duplex mismatch. It also degrades performance unnecessarily.

  • Configure the interface with 'no shutdown' to re-enable the interface.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is incorrect because the interface is already up/up (as indicated by 'Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s'), so 'no shutdown' is unnecessary and does not fix the duplex mismatch.

  • Configure the interface with 'duplex auto' and 'speed auto'.

    Why this is correct

    This is correct because enabling auto-negotiation on R1 allows both sides to negotiate a common duplex setting. Since R2 is likely set to half-duplex, auto-negotiation will result in half-duplex on both ends, eliminating the mismatch and CRC errors.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Configure the interface with 'duplex auto' and 'speed auto'.Correct answer

Why this is correct

This is correct because enabling auto-negotiation on R1 allows both sides to negotiate a common duplex setting. Since R2 is likely set to half-duplex, auto-negotiation will result in half-duplex on both ends, eliminating the mismatch and CRC errors.

Configure the interface with 'duplex full' and 'speed 1000'.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Forcing the same settings on R1 does not change R2's configuration; the duplex mismatch remains.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates see the interface is already full-duplex/1000 and think forcing it will stabilize the link, but they overlook the need for matching settings on both ends.

Configure the interface with 'duplex half' and 'speed 100'.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Slowing down the link is a workaround, not a fix; the mismatch still exists if R2 is half-duplex at 1000 Mbps.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates think lowering speed can eliminate CRC errors, but the real issue is duplex mismatch, not speed.

Configure the interface with 'no shutdown' to re-enable the interface.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The interface is administratively up; the issue is physical layer errors, not administrative state.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates sometimes assume intermittent connectivity means the interface is down, but the output shows it is up.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the 200-301 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which 200-301 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-301 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

Network Infrastructure and Connectivity — This question tests Network Infrastructure and Connectivity — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Configure the interface with 'duplex auto' and 'speed auto'. — The output indicates high CRC errors on a GigabitEthernet interface operating at 1000 Mb/s and full-duplex. Since 1000BASE-T does not support half-duplex, a duplex mismatch is not possible. The CRC errors likely result from a speed or duplex negotiation mismatch where one side uses forced settings (e.g., speed 1000 duplex full) and the other uses auto-negotiation, causing physical layer instability. Setting both sides to auto-negotiation ('duplex auto' and 'speed auto') allows them to properly agree on the highest common speed and duplex, resolving the errors. Option A forces full and 1000, which may not match R2 if it is set to auto, so it is not a reliable fix. Option B uses 'duplex half', which is invalid on Gigabit links and would break connectivity. Option C's 'no shutdown' is irrelevant because the interface is already administratively up.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Identify which 200-301 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

3 more ways this is tested on 200-301

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. You are connected to R1. The network team reports intermittent connectivity between R1 and R2. Examine the following `show interface` output from R1 to identify the root cause of the issue. Then apply the necessary configuration commands on R1 to resolve the problem. GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 10.0.0.1/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is RJ45 output flow-control is unsupported, input flow-control is unsupported Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:01, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 100 packets input, 8000 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 100 input errors, 100 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

hard
  • A.Enter interface configuration mode for the problematic interface and issue the 'no speed' and 'no duplex' commands to revert to auto-negotiation.
  • B.Enter interface configuration mode and issue the 'speed 100' and 'duplex full' commands to ensure both sides are set to the same values.
  • C.Enter interface configuration mode and issue the 'no shutdown' command to bring the interface up.
  • D.Enter interface configuration mode and issue the 'duplex half' command to match the remote side's duplex setting.

Why A: The show interface output reveals 100 CRC errors and 100 input errors, indicating a physical layer problem. Additionally, the interface is manually configured for full-duplex and 100 Mb/s. CRC errors often point to a duplex mismatch or faulty cable. Since R1 is set to full-duplex, if R2 is set to auto-negotiation (or half-duplex), a mismatch occurs. The fix is to set both sides to auto-negotiation by removing manual speed and duplex settings. On R1, enter interface configuration mode and issue 'no speed' and 'no duplex' to revert to auto-negotiation, then verify with 'show interfaces' that the interface negotiates to full-duplex and errors stop incrementing.

Variation 2. You are connected to R1. The link between R1's GigabitEthernet0/0 and R2's GigabitEthernet0/0 should operate at 1 Gbps full duplex, but the interface is showing errors and only negotiating at 100 Mbps half duplex. Diagnose and fix the fault, then verify the link is stable at the correct speed and duplex.

hard
  • A.Remove the manual speed and duplex settings on R1's GigabitEthernet0/0 with 'no speed' and 'no duplex' to allow auto-negotiation.
  • B.Change the duplex setting to 'full' and speed to '1000' on R1's GigabitEthernet0/0.
  • C.Replace the cable between R1 and R2 with a crossover cable.
  • D.Configure R2's GigabitEthernet0/0 with 'speed 100' and 'duplex half' to match R1's settings.

Why A: The interface was manually configured with 'duplex half' and 'speed 100', which forced the link to 100 Mbps half duplex, causing CRC errors due to duplex mismatch. The correct fix is to remove these manual settings and allow auto-negotiation, or explicitly set both sides to 'speed 1000' and 'duplex full'. Since the remote side (R2) is set to auto (default), the simplest correction is to use 'no duplex' and 'no speed' on R1 to re-enable auto-negotiation. After the commands are applied, the interface should show 'Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s' and CRC errors should stop incrementing.

Variation 3. A network technician is troubleshooting a connectivity issue between two directly connected switches, SW1 and SW2. Hosts on VLAN 10 connected to SW1 can ping each other but cannot ping the default gateway or any host on VLAN 10 connected to SW2. The interface on SW1 is up/up, but the interface on SW2 is up/down. What is the most likely cause of the problem?

hard
  • A.Configure the interface on SW2 to use a different MTU value.
  • B.Ensure both switches are configured for the same duplex setting, preferably by enabling autonegotiation on both interfaces.
  • C.Replace the Ethernet cable connecting SW1 and SW2.
  • D.Check for late collisions on the interface and increase the collision window size.

Why B: The interface on SW2 is up/down, which typically indicates a Layer 1 issue such as a duplex mismatch. Duplex mismatch occurs when one switch is manually set to full duplex and the other to half duplex or auto-negotiation fails, causing the side expecting full duplex to report up/down due to excessive errors. Option A is incorrect because MTU mismatch would cause connectivity issues but not an up/down interface state. Option C is incorrect because a faulty cable would likely cause both interfaces to be down/down, not up/down. Option D is incorrect because late collisions are a symptom of duplex mismatch, not a separate cause; increasing collision window size is not a standard troubleshooting step. The correct solution is to ensure both switches use the same duplex setting, preferably via autonegotiation (IEEE 802.3u).

Last reviewed: Jun 6, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.