Courseiva
IP RoutingmediumDrag & DropObjective-mapped

CCNA IP Routing Practice Question

Drag and drop the following steps into the correct order to configure a single-area OSPFv2 network on two Cisco routers (R1 and R2) and observe the neighbor state transitions from Down to Full.

Drag steps to the numbered slots on the right, or tap a step then tap a slot.

Steps
Order
1Step 1
2Step 2
3Step 3
4Step 4
5Step 5

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap is that candidates might think interfaces must be up before OSPF configuration, or that verification can be done after configuring only one router. The correct sequence ensures both routers are configured before checking neighbor states.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then add the network; repeat on R2; ensure interfaces are up; finally verify neighbor states.

First configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then add the network; repeat on R2; ensure interfaces are up; finally verify neighbor states to see the full transition sequence.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then add the network; repeat on R2; ensure interfaces are up; finally verify neighbor states.

    Why this is correct

    This is the correct order because OSPF neighbor adjacency requires both routers to have the OSPF process, router-id, and network statements in place before the interfaces can form the adjacency. The network command tells OSPF which interfaces to advertise, so it must be configured right after the process is created on each router. After configuring both R1 and R2, ensuring that interfaces are up (no shutdown) allows the routers to exchange Hello packets and advance neighbor states from Down through Init, 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange, Loading, to Full. Verification with 'show ip ospf neighbor' then confirms whether the adjacency reaches the Full state.

  • Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then ensure interfaces are up; repeat on R2; add the network; finally verify neighbor states.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is incorrect because interfaces must be up before OSPF can form adjacencies, but the network command should be configured before verifying neighbor states; however, the order of 'ensure interfaces up' and 'add network' is swapped relative to the correct sequence.

  • Ensure interfaces are up on both routers, then configure OSPF process and router-id on R1; add the network; repeat on R2; finally verify neighbor states.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is incorrect because OSPF configuration should be done before verifying neighbor states, but the order of 'ensure interfaces up' before OSPF configuration is acceptable; however, the network command must be added after OSPF process, and the sequence is otherwise correct but the placement of 'ensure interfaces up' is not wrong, but the question expects a specific order that starts with OSPF configuration.

  • Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then add the network; ensure interfaces are up; repeat on R2; finally verify neighbor states.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is incorrect because after configuring OSPF on R1, you should repeat the process on R2 before verifying neighbor states; ensuring interfaces up can be done at any point, but the sequence should complete configuration on both routers before verification.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then add the network; repeat on R2; ensure interfaces are up; finally verify neighbor states.Correct answer

Why this is correct

This is the correct order because OSPF neighbor adjacency requires both routers to have the OSPF process, router-id, and network statements in place before the interfaces can form the adjacency. The network command tells OSPF which interfaces to advertise, so it must be configured right after the process is created on each router. After configuring both R1 and R2, ensuring that interfaces are up (no shutdown) allows the routers to exchange Hello packets and advance neighbor states from Down through Init, 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange, Loading, to Full. Verification with 'show ip ospf neighbor' then confirms whether the adjacency reaches the Full state.

Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then ensure interfaces are up; repeat on R2; add the network; finally verify neighbor states.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The specific factual error: The network command should be configured after OSPF process and router-id, but before verifying neighbor states; ensuring interfaces up can be done before or after OSPF configuration, but typically after network command to avoid false down states.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might think interfaces must be up before any OSPF configuration, but OSPF can be configured first; the key is that the network command must be present for OSPF to form adjacencies.

Ensure interfaces are up on both routers, then configure OSPF process and router-id on R1; add the network; repeat on R2; finally verify neighbor states.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The specific factual error: While ensuring interfaces up early is not wrong, the standard procedure is to configure OSPF first; the question expects the order as in option A.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might think that interfaces must be up before any OSPF configuration to avoid errors, but OSPF can be configured on down interfaces; the neighbor state will not progress until interfaces are up.

Configure OSPF process and router-id on R1, then add the network; ensure interfaces are up; repeat on R2; finally verify neighbor states.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The specific factual error: The step 'ensure interfaces are up' is placed after adding network on R1 but before configuring R2, which is not the typical order; the correct order is to complete configuration on both routers before verification.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might think that interfaces must be up on R1 before moving to R2, but OSPF configuration on R2 does not depend on R1's interface state; the neighbor state will not form until both sides are configured.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

One of 1,389 original 200-301 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.