Courseiva
Question 1,401 of 1,389
Network Services and SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Services and Security Practice Question

Exhibit

R1# show ip interface GigabitEthernet0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Internet address is 192.168.1.1/24
  Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
  Address determined by setup command
  MTU is 1500 bytes
  Helper address is not set
  Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
  Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.251 224.0.0.252
  Outgoing access list is not set
  Inbound  access list is not set
  Proxy ARP is enabled
  Local Proxy ARP is disabled

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer is troubleshooting an ACL that is not filtering traffic as expected. The engineer runs the show access-lists 110 command and notices that all access control entries (ACEs) show zero matches, even though traffic that should match the permit or deny statements is traversing the network. The engineer then checks the interface configuration. What is the most likely cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the distinction between creating an ACL and applying it to an interface, trapping candidates who assume that simply defining an ACL with 'access-list' commands is enough to filter traffic, when in fact the 'ip access-group' command under the interface is mandatory for the ACL to take effect.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface.

If an ACL is not applied to any interface, it will never process traffic, and the 'show access-lists' command will show zero matches for all ACEs. The engineer confirmed that traffic matching the ACL entries is traversing the network, but the ACL counters remain at zero, which directly indicates that the ACL is not being invoked by any interface configuration. Applying an ACL to an interface with the 'ip access-group' command is required for it to filter traffic.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The ACL is applied to the interface in the wrong direction (inbound instead of outbound).

    Why it's wrong here

    If the ACL were applied in any direction, the output would show an access list number or name, even if it were the wrong direction. Both lines are 'not set', proving that no ACL is assigned.

  • The access-list 110 syntax has incorrect subnet masks causing no matches.

    Why it's wrong here

    ACL syntax errors, including incorrect wildcard masks, would not prevent the ACL from being displayed as applied on the interface; 'show ip interface' would still list the ACL number or name even if its matching logic was flawed. The output shows 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set', which proves that no ACL is attached to GigabitEthernet0/0 at all. Furthermore, if the masks were wrong, the ACL would still be present in 'show ip access-lists', so the absence from the interface output definitively rules this out as the cause.

  • The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface.

    Why this is correct

    The 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set' lines in the exhibit directly prove that no ACL has been applied to GigabitEthernet0/0. Since ACL 110 exists but isn't attached to any interface, it never processes traffic and shows zero hit counts.

  • The interface GigabitEthernet0/0 is administratively down, preventing ACL processing.

    Why it's wrong here

    The exhibit's first line clearly states 'GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up', meaning the interface is operational and capable of forwarding traffic. An administratively down interface would display 'administratively down, line protocol is down' and would not pass any packets, making ACL processing irrelevant. Since the interface is up, the lack of ACL hit counts must be explained by the ACL not being applied rather than by an interface state issue.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface.Correct answer

Why this is correct

The 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set' lines in the exhibit directly prove that no ACL has been applied to GigabitEthernet0/0. Since ACL 110 exists but isn't attached to any interface, it never processes traffic and shows zero hit counts.

The ACL is applied to the interface in the wrong direction (inbound instead of outbound).Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A common mistake is to try to explain zero matches by directional misapplication without first checking whether an ACL is actually present. The exhibit explicitly shows no ACL is bound.

The access-list 110 syntax has incorrect subnet masks causing no matches.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Some candidates fixate on ACL configuration details instead of verifying interface assignment. The output confirms the interface has no ACL, not that an ACL is configured incorrectly.

The interface GigabitEthernet0/0 is administratively down, preventing ACL processing.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Candidates sometimes misread interface status. This output clearly shows the interface is enabled and up, so a down state is not the issue.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.