Question 1,401 of 1,819
Network Services and SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the ACL 110 is not applied to any interface. This is the most likely cause because an ACL, no matter how precisely its access control entries are defined, only filters traffic when it is explicitly applied to an interface in the inbound or outbound direction. The show access-lists command confirms the ACL exists but shows zero matches, while the interface configuration reveals that no access list is set, meaning the router never consults ACL 110 during packet forwarding. On the CCNA 200-301 v2 exam, this scenario tests your understanding that defining an ACL is a separate step from applying it with the ip access-group command under the interface; a common trap is assuming a configured ACL is active by default. Remember the memory tip: "Define it, then assign it—no interface, no filter."

CCNA Network Services and Security Practice Question

This 200-301 practice question tests your understanding of network services and security. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

R1# show ip interface GigabitEthernet0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Internet address is 192.168.1.1/24
  Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
  Address determined by setup command
  MTU is 1500 bytes
  Helper address is not set
  Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
  Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.251 224.0.0.252
  Outgoing access list is not set
  Inbound  access list is not set
  Proxy ARP is enabled
  Local Proxy ARP is disabled

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer is troubleshooting an ACL that is not filtering traffic as expected. The engineer runs the show access-lists 110 command and notices that all access control entries (ACEs) show zero matches, even though traffic that should match the permit or deny statements is traversing the network. The engineer then checks the interface configuration. What is the most likely cause?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Study the full ACL explanation →

Exhibit

R1# show ip interface GigabitEthernet0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Internet address is 192.168.1.1/24
  Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
  Address determined by setup command
  MTU is 1500 bytes
  Helper address is not set
  Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
  Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.251 224.0.0.252
  Outgoing access list is not set
  Inbound  access list is not set
  Proxy ARP is enabled
  Local Proxy ARP is disabled

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface.

The exhibit shows 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set' under GigabitEthernet0/0. This confirms that no access list has been applied to this interface, so access list 110, though defined, is not filtering any traffic. Zero matches are observed because the ACL is never consulted.

Key principle: Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The ACL is applied to the interface in the wrong direction (inbound instead of outbound).

    Why it's wrong here

    If the ACL were applied in any direction, the output would show an access list number or name, even if it were the wrong direction. Both lines are 'not set', proving that no ACL is assigned.

  • The access-list 110 syntax has incorrect subnet masks causing no matches.

    Why it's wrong here

    Syntax errors in the ACL entries would not prevent the access list from being applied or shown on the interface. The issue is the absence of any applied ACL.

  • The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface.

    Why this is correct

    The 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set' lines in the exhibit directly prove that no ACL has been applied to GigabitEthernet0/0. Since ACL 110 exists but isn't attached to any interface, it never processes traffic and shows zero hit counts.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

  • The interface GigabitEthernet0/0 is administratively down, preventing ACL processing.

    Why it's wrong here

    The first line of the exhibit states 'GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up', indicating the interface is operational. An administratively down interface would show 'administratively down, line protocol is down'.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface.Correct answer

Why this is correct

The 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set' lines in the exhibit directly prove that no ACL has been applied to GigabitEthernet0/0. Since ACL 110 exists but isn't attached to any interface, it never processes traffic and shows zero hit counts.

The ACL is applied to the interface in the wrong direction (inbound instead of outbound).Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A common mistake is to try to explain zero matches by directional misapplication without first checking whether an ACL is actually present. The exhibit explicitly shows no ACL is bound.

The access-list 110 syntax has incorrect subnet masks causing no matches.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Some candidates fixate on ACL configuration details instead of verifying interface assignment. The output confirms the interface has no ACL, not that an ACL is configured incorrectly.

The interface GigabitEthernet0/0 is administratively down, preventing ACL processing.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Candidates sometimes misread interface status. This output clearly shows the interface is enabled and up, so a down state is not the issue.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    If the ACL were applied in any direction, the output would show an access list number or name, even if it were the wrong direction. Both lines are 'not set', proving that no ACL is assigned.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Key takeaway

Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security administrator must allow nursing staff to reach a patient records server while blocking access from the guest Wi-Fi VLAN. After applying an extended ACL, traffic is still blocked from nursing workstations. The ACL was applied outbound instead of inbound on the wrong interface. Questions like this test ACL direction and placement rules.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related 200-301 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-301 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

Network Services and Security — This question tests Network Services and Security — CIDR notation defines the prefix length..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The ACL 110 is not applied to any interface. — The exhibit shows 'Inbound access list is not set' and 'Outgoing access list is not set' under GigabitEthernet0/0. This confirms that no access list has been applied to this interface, so access list 110, though defined, is not filtering any traffic. Zero matches are observed because the ACL is never consulted.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related 200-301 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 14, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.