Question 308 of 1,389
CCNA Network Services and Security Practice Question
After securing a switch by running 'ip ssh version 2' and generating RSA keys with 'crypto key generate rsa modulus 1024', remote SSH connections fail with a 'key exchange error'. A check of the SSH client’s documentation reveals it requires a minimum 2048-bit RSA key for SSH version 2. What should the technician do next?
⚠ Common exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that any SSH connection failure is a connectivity or configuration issue, when in fact it is a cryptographic key length mismatch that requires regenerating the RSA key pair with a larger modulus.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Regenerate the RSA key pair on the switch with a 2048-bit modulus using the command 'crypto key generate rsa modulus 2048'.
The error is caused by the SSH client requiring a minimum 2048-bit RSA key for SSH version 2, but the switch was configured with a 1024-bit key. The correct solution is to regenerate the RSA key pair with a 2048-bit modulus using 'crypto key generate rsa modulus 2048', which satisfies the client's security requirement and allows SSH version 2 to establish a secure connection.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Verify IP connectivity between the client and the switch by issuing a ping from the client to the switch.
Why it's wrong here
A ping test verifies only Layer 3 reachability via ICMP, not the SSH cryptographic handshake. Since the key-exchange error occurs after the TCP connection and SSH protocol version exchange, the client has already proven IP connectivity to the switch. Issuing a ping will likely succeed but will not alter or identify the switch's 1024-bit host key, which is the actual cause of the failure.
- ✗
Check the SSH client configuration on the host to ensure it accepts 1024-bit keys.
Why it's wrong here
Lowering the host's SSH client to accept 1024-bit keys would mean relaxing the client's security policy, and modern SSH clients often hard-code a minimum key size, refusing the setting entirely. The stated environment requirement is that the client demands 2048-bit keys, so the correct fix is to align the switch to that requirement, not to weaken the client. SSH clients do not negotiate key strength; they simply reject undersized keys, so this action cannot resolve the handshake failure.
- ✓
Regenerate the RSA key pair on the switch with a 2048-bit modulus using the command 'crypto key generate rsa modulus 2048'.
Why this is correct
Regenerating the key pair with a higher modulus directly resolves the key-strength mismatch. The switch will then present a 2048-bit key during the SSH handshake, fixing the key exchange error. The existing 'ip ssh version 2' setting remains active after rekeying.
- ✗
Disable SSH version 2 on the switch and revert to SSH version 1, which does not enforce key length restrictions.
Why it's wrong here
Reverting to SSH version 1 is a severe security regression because SSHv1 is deprecated and vulnerable to cryptographic flaws that can leak session data. More importantly, the client explicitly requires SSH version 2, so disabling version 2 on the switch would make the client refuse the connection outright over a protocol-version mismatch. The observed failure occurs during an SSHv2 key exchange when the server's RSA host key is only 1024 bits; changing the protocol version does not alter the host key's modulus length.
Option-by-option analysis
Why each answer is right or wrong
Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.
✓Regenerate the RSA key pair on the switch with a 2048-bit modulus using the command 'crypto key generate rsa modulus 2048'.Correct answer▾
Why this is correct
Regenerating the key pair with a higher modulus directly resolves the key-strength mismatch. The switch will then present a 2048-bit key during the SSH handshake, fixing the key exchange error. The existing 'ip ssh version 2' setting remains active after rekeying.
✗Verify IP connectivity between the client and the switch by issuing a ping from the client to the switch.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Assuming that a connection failure always starts at Layer 1 or 3, ignoring the specific error message that points to an application-layer mismatch.
✗Check the SSH client configuration on the host to ensure it accepts 1024-bit keys.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Misplaced troubleshooting – attempting to relax security instead of fixing the server’s key size to meet the documented standard.
✗Disable SSH version 2 on the switch and revert to SSH version 1, which does not enforce key length restrictions.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Drastic and insecure step that misdiagnoses the root cause; the issue is key size, not protocol version.
Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”
Quick reference
Asymmetric Encryption Algorithm Comparison
| Algorithm | Key Exchange | Signatures | Equivalent Security Key | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSA-3072 | Yes | Yes | 128-bit | Widely deployed; slow for bulk data |
| ECDSA P-256 | No | Yes | 128-bit | Fast signatures; standard TLS certs |
| ECDH / ECDHE | Yes | No | 128-bit | Perfect forward secrecy in TLS 1.3 |
| DH / DHE | Yes | No | 128-bit (3072-bit key) | Replaced by ECDHE in modern TLS |
| Ed25519 | No | Yes | ~128-bit | SSH keys, modern PKI |
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026
This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.