hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

R1#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.1.50.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
 network 10.1.50.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

R2#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.1.50.2 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
 network 10.1.50.0 0.0.0.255 area 1

Based on the exhibit, what is the most likely reason R1 is not forming an OSPF adjacency with R2?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, what is the most likely reason R1 is not forming an OSPF adjacency with R2?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

The OSPF areas do not match on the shared segment.

This is correct because the same link is placed into area 0 on one side and area 1 on the other.

B

Distractor review

The routers must use different process IDs.

This is wrong because matching or differing local process IDs is not the issue here.

C

Distractor review

The interfaces are in different IPv4 subnets.

This is wrong because both are in 10.1.50.0/24.

D

Distractor review

OSPF cannot run on Ethernet interfaces.

This is wrong because OSPF commonly runs on Ethernet.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

A frequent exam trap is assuming that OSPF process IDs must match on both routers to form adjacency. Many candidates mistakenly believe that differing process IDs prevent neighbor relationships, but process IDs are local to each router and do not need to match. Another common mistake is focusing on IP subnet mismatches or interface types, which are often correct but not the root cause here. The real issue is the OSPF area mismatch, which is less obvious but critical. Ignoring the area ID difference leads to confusion because routers can be on the same subnet and exchange hellos but never form adjacency.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a link-state routing protocol that forms neighbor adjacencies between routers on shared network segments. For two routers to establish an OSPF adjacency, they must agree on several parameters, including the subnet, hello and dead intervals, authentication, and crucially, the OSPF area assigned to the interface. The OSPF area is a logical grouping that segments the network to optimize routing and reduce overhead. Routers on the same physical segment must place that interface in the same OSPF area to exchange link-state advertisements and form a neighbor relationship. The OSPF adjacency formation process involves routers exchanging hello packets to discover neighbors and negotiate parameters. If the routers detect a mismatch in the OSPF area ID on their connected interfaces, they will not progress beyond the initial hello exchange, preventing adjacency formation. This area mismatch acts as a fundamental barrier because OSPF treats each area as a separate routing domain, and adjacency is only valid within the same area. Cisco IOS requires exact area ID matches on both ends of a link for adjacency to form. A common exam trap is to overlook the OSPF area mismatch and instead focus on other parameters like process IDs or IP subnet mismatches. While process IDs are locally significant and can differ without affecting adjacency, the area ID must match exactly. In practical network troubleshooting, an area mismatch can cause silent failures where routers appear connected at Layer 2 and share IP subnets but never become OSPF neighbors. Recognizing this subtle but critical configuration error is essential for both exam success and real-world OSPF troubleshooting.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF routers must assign the same area ID to interfaces on a shared segment to form neighbor adjacencies successfully.
  • OSPF process IDs are local to each router and do not need to match for adjacency to form between neighbors.
  • OSPF adjacency formation requires matching hello and dead intervals, subnet, authentication, and area ID on connected interfaces.
  • Routers on the same IP subnet but with different OSPF area assignments will not establish an OSPF neighbor relationship.
  • An OSPF area mismatch prevents the exchange of link-state advertisements, blocking routing updates between neighbors.
  • OSPF adjacency failures due to area mismatches often appear as silent failures with no neighbor state progression beyond 'Init' or '2-Way'.
  • Correct OSPF configuration requires consistent area assignment on both ends of a link to ensure proper routing domain segmentation.
  • Exam candidates should prioritize verifying OSPF area consistency before troubleshooting other parameters like process ID or interface type.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

OSPF routers must assign the same area ID to interfaces on a shared segment to form neighbor adjacencies successfully.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The OSPF areas do not match on the shared segment. — The most likely reason is an OSPF area mismatch on the connected interfaces. In practical terms, the routers are on the same IP subnet, and the hello timers shown are not the issue, but each side places the shared link into a different OSPF area. OSPF neighbors on the same segment must agree on the area for the adjacency to form. This is a classic OSPF troubleshooting item because everything can look almost correct at first glance. One incorrect area value is enough to block the neighbor relationship.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.