Courseiva
Network Services and SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Services and Security Practice Question

An administrator sees high interface utilization through SNMP graphs but wants to identify which conversations are responsible. Which addition best closes that visibility gap?

⚠ Common exam trap

Avoid assuming all network monitoring tools provide the same level of detail. Understand the specific capabilities of each tool.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

NetFlow

NetFlow provides conversation-level visibility into which hosts and applications are consuming bandwidth, closing the gap left by SNMP's interface totals. A new DHCP scope assigns IP addresses but offers no traffic insight. An STP priority manages loop-free topology and does not affect monitoring. A larger OSPF metric influences routing path selection, not traffic analysis.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • NetFlow

    Why this is correct

    NetFlow (and similar flow export technologies) captures metadata for each IP conversation traversing the interface, including source/destination addresses, L4 ports, and byte counts. This allows the administrator to aggregate by host, application, or TCP/UDP port and immediately identify the top talkers driving the interface to high utilization. Unlike SNMP counters that show only aggregate usage, NetFlow correlates the utilization to specific flows.

  • Another DHCP scope

    Why it's wrong here

    A DHCP scope is a pool of IP addresses that a server hands out to clients; it controls address assignment, not traffic measurement. Adding another scope would only expand the number of leases available, and while it might indirectly change addressing, it would not reveal which applications or conversations fill the interface. The 'high utilization' observed via SNMP therefore remains an unexplained aggregate number, not a conversation detail.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a scenario where the question asks about expanding IP address availability in a network with multiple subnets experiencing address exhaustion, adding another DHCP scope could be the correct answer to ensure devices can obtain IP addresses.

  • A new STP priority

    Why it's wrong here

    STP priority is a spanning-tree election value that determines which switch becomes the root and which redundant paths are placed in blocking state. Reconfiguring it can move traffic to a different physical path, but it offers zero visibility into existing flows. The administrator needs a flow-based telemetry source, not a topology-control parameter, to see the specific traffic causing high utilization.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a scenario where the question asks about optimizing network performance by adjusting STP settings to prevent loops or improve redundancy, selecting a new STP priority could be correct. For example, if the question focuses on reducing broadcast storms in a VLAN environment, adjusting STP priority could be the right answer.

  • A larger OSPF metric

    Why it's wrong here

    OSPF metric (cost) is a routing parameter that influences shortest-path selection, not a tool for inspecting live traffic. Even with a larger metric on an interface, the administrator would only see route changes, never which source/destination pairs are consuming the interface's bandwidth. SNMP utilization counters are aggregate, so OSPF tuning cannot break down the utilization by conversation.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a scenario where the question asks about optimizing OSPF routing performance or managing traffic flow in a congested network, increasing the OSPF metric for certain routes could be the correct answer. This would prioritize other routes and potentially alleviate congestion.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

NetFlowCorrect answer

Why this is correct

NetFlow (and similar flow export technologies) captures metadata for each IP conversation traversing the interface, including source/destination addresses, L4 ports, and byte counts. This allows the administrator to aggregate by host, application, or TCP/UDP port and immediately identify the top talkers driving the interface to high utilization. Unlike SNMP counters that show only aggregate usage, NetFlow correlates the utilization to specific flows.

Another DHCP scopeWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A DHCP scope is used to assign IP addresses to hosts on a subnet; it does not provide any information about traffic flows or bandwidth consumption. Therefore, adding another DHCP scope would not help identify which conversations are responsible for high interface utilization.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a scenario where the question asks about expanding IP address availability in a network with multiple subnets experiencing address exhaustion, adding another DHCP scope could be the correct answer to ensure devices can obtain IP addresses.

Why candidates choose this

Students might confuse DHCP with network monitoring tools because DHCP is involved in network configuration, but it has no capability to report on traffic conversations.

A new STP priorityWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

STP priority is a parameter used in Spanning Tree Protocol to influence root bridge election and loop prevention; it does not provide any visibility into traffic flows or bandwidth usage. Changing STP priority would not help identify which conversations are consuming bandwidth.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a scenario where the question asks about optimizing network performance by adjusting STP settings to prevent loops or improve redundancy, selecting a new STP priority could be correct. For example, if the question focuses on reducing broadcast storms in a VLAN environment, adjusting STP priority could be the right answer.

Why candidates choose this

Students might think that STP priority affects traffic paths and thus could help identify conversations, but STP only controls the logical topology for loop prevention, not traffic monitoring.

A larger OSPF metricWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

OSPF metric is used for routing path selection based on cost; it does not provide any information about actual traffic flows or bandwidth consumption. Adjusting OSPF metrics might change routing paths but does not offer visibility into which conversations are responsible for high utilization.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a scenario where the question asks about optimizing OSPF routing performance or managing traffic flow in a congested network, increasing the OSPF metric for certain routes could be the correct answer. This would prioritize other routes and potentially alleviate congestion.

Why candidates choose this

Students might associate OSPF metrics with traffic engineering and assume they can help identify bandwidth hogs, but metrics only influence routing decisions, not monitoring.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

This 200-301 question is part of Courseiva's 1,389-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.