Courseiva
Network Services and SecuritymediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Services and Security Practice Question

A switch port is configured with port-security violation mode restrict. Which two statements are true when an unauthorized MAC address appears?

⚠ Common exam trap

Do not confuse restrict with shutdown mode; restrict does not disable the port.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Frames from the unauthorized MAC are dropped

Restrict drops frames from violating MAC addresses and can increment the violation counter while keeping the port up. Shutdown would err-disable the port instead.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Frames from the unauthorized MAC are dropped

    Why this is correct

    In restrict mode, the switch filters out frames sourced from the violating MAC address while still permitting traffic from other authorized MACs. The port remains operational and continues to forward legitimate frames, but the offending source address is effectively blacklisted at the port level. This is distinct from protect mode, which silently drops, and shutdown mode, which disables the port.

  • The port remains up

    Why this is correct

    Unlike shutdown mode, restrict does not place the interface into an err-disabled state upon a security violation. The port stays administratively up and continues to pass traffic from non-violating MAC addresses, allowing network operations to continue while the violation is logged and counted. This is a key operational difference, as it avoids manual or automatic recovery procedures.

  • The interface immediately goes into err-disabled state

    Why it's wrong here

    Immediate err-disabling is characteristic of the shutdown violation mode, where the switch disables the port and requires manual re-enablement or a configured errdisable recovery. In restrict mode, the port does not transition to err-disabled; instead, the violating frames are dropped and counter/log entries are generated. So this option incorrectly describes restrict mode.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This option would be correct if the question specified port-security violation mode shutdown, where the interface immediately enters err-disabled state upon a violation.

  • The switch converts the port to a trunk automatically

    Why it's wrong here

    Port security is a Layer 2 access security feature that governs which source MAC addresses are allowed to send frames, and it has no mechanism for automatically changing the interface's switchport mode to trunk. Trunk conversion is controlled by Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP) or explicit configuration, unrelated to port security violations. Therefore, the violation mode has no impact on trunking state.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This would be correct if the question asked about a switch feature like Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP) where the port automatically negotiates trunking, or if the port was configured with 'switchport mode dynamic desirable' and the connected device is a trunk-capable switch.

  • The violation mode changes itself to shutdown after three attempts

    Why it's wrong here

    The port security violation mode is a static configuration parameter; it does not dynamically escalate or change based on the number of violations. In restrict mode, repeated violations continue to result in dropped frames and incremented counters, but the mode itself remains restrict unless an administrator manually reconfigures it. Shutdown mode would only be active if initially configured, and there is no built-in three-strike escalation.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This would be correct if the question specified that the port-security violation mode is shutdown and asked about the behavior after three violations. In that case, the port would enter err-disabled state after three attempts.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Frames from the unauthorized MAC are droppedCorrect answer

Why this is correct

In restrict mode, the switch filters out frames sourced from the violating MAC address while still permitting traffic from other authorized MACs. The port remains operational and continues to forward legitimate frames, but the offending source address is effectively blacklisted at the port level. This is distinct from protect mode, which silently drops, and shutdown mode, which disables the port.

The interface immediately goes into err-disabled stateWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

In restrict mode, the interface does not go into err-disabled state; it stays up and drops frames from unauthorized MACs while logging the violation.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This option would be correct if the question specified port-security violation mode shutdown, where the interface immediately enters err-disabled state upon a violation.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse restrict mode with shutdown mode, as both are common port-security violation actions, but only shutdown causes err-disabled.

The switch converts the port to a trunk automaticallyWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

In port-security violation mode 'restrict', the switch does not automatically convert the port to a trunk; it only drops frames from unauthorized MACs and logs the violation.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This would be correct if the question asked about a switch feature like Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP) where the port automatically negotiates trunking, or if the port was configured with 'switchport mode dynamic desirable' and the connected device is a trunk-capable switch.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse port-security violation actions with other switch features like trunk auto-negotiation, or mistakenly think that security violations trigger port mode changes.

The violation mode changes itself to shutdown after three attemptsWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

In restrict mode, the switch does not change the violation mode to shutdown after any number of attempts; it simply drops frames from unauthorized MACs and logs the violation. The mode remains restrict indefinitely.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This would be correct if the question specified that the port-security violation mode is shutdown and asked about the behavior after three violations. In that case, the port would enter err-disabled state after three attempts.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse restrict mode with shutdown mode, or think that restrict mode escalates to shutdown after repeated violations, similar to how some security features have a threshold-based response.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

Switch VLAN 10 Sales (192.168.10.0/24) PC-A PC-B VLAN 20 HR (192.168.20.0/24) PC-C PC-D Router VLANs isolate traffic — inter-VLAN routing requires a Layer 3 device

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 200-301 question from scratch — 1,389 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.