Courseiva
IP RoutinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA IP Routing Practice Question

A static route is configured as 198.51.100.0/24 via 192.0.2.9, but the connected network to the next hop goes down. What happens to the static route in the routing table?

⚠ Common exam trap

Remember that static routes are removed if the next hop is unreachable, unlike dynamic routes that may have additional states.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

It is removed because the recursive next hop is no longer reachable.

If the outgoing interface or connected path to the next hop becomes unreachable, the router cannot resolve the recursive next hop and the route is removed from the table.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • It remains permanently because static routes never disappear.

    Why it's wrong here

    While a static route configuration remains in the running-config and is not deleted unless an administrator removes it, the route itself may be purged from the routing table if its next hop becomes unreachable. Cisco IOS performs recursive lookup, and if the next hop cannot be resolved, the route is marked invalid and is not used for packet forwarding. Thus static routes can effectively disappear from the routing table even though the configuration persists.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different question, if it asked whether static routes are permanently stored in the routing table regardless of the state of the next hop, option A would be correct. This would imply a scenario where the static route is not affected by the operational status of the next hop.

  • It is removed because the recursive next hop is no longer reachable.

    Why this is correct

    In Cisco IOS, a static route with a recursive next-hop requires that the next-hop IP address be resolvable through another route before it can be installed in the RIB. When the recursive lookup fails because 192.0.2.9 is no longer reachable, the router removes the static route from the routing table, though the configuration remains. This is why the route disappears from forwarding decisions.

  • It changes automatically into a default route.

    Why it's wrong here

    A default route is a catch-all entry with prefix 0.0.0.0/0, whereas the configured static route points to the specific subnet 198.51.100.0/24. Routers do not automatically alter the prefix length or destination of a static route in response to topology changes; doing so would require explicit configuration. Therefore, this route cannot transform itself into a default route under any condition.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different scenario, if a static route was configured with a specific destination and the administrator later decided to change the route to a default route (0.0.0.0/0) for all traffic, this option could be correct if the question asked about the outcome of that specific configuration change.

  • It becomes an OSPF external route.

    Why it's wrong here

    A static route is an independent control-plane entry; it does not automatically become an OSPF route unless it is explicitly redistributed into the OSPF process using commands such as redistribute static. Without that configuration, OSPF is unaware of the static route, and no external LSA (Type 5) is generated. The presence of OSPF on the router does not cause static routes to be reclassified.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different scenario, if the question stated that a static route was configured and the router was running OSPF with a redistribution policy that converts static routes into OSPF external routes, then this option could be correct when the static route is redistributed into OSPF.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

It is removed because the recursive next hop is no longer reachable.Correct answer

Why this is correct

In Cisco IOS, a static route with a recursive next-hop requires that the next-hop IP address be resolvable through another route before it can be installed in the RIB. When the recursive lookup fails because 192.0.2.9 is no longer reachable, the router removes the static route from the routing table, though the configuration remains. This is why the route disappears from forwarding decisions.

It remains permanently because static routes never disappear.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Static routes are not permanent; they are removed from the routing table if the next-hop interface goes down or the next-hop IP becomes unreachable, because the route is no longer valid.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different question, if it asked whether static routes are permanently stored in the routing table regardless of the state of the next hop, option A would be correct. This would imply a scenario where the static route is not affected by the operational status of the next hop.

Why candidates choose this

Students may think static routes are always present once configured, but they forget that the router must be able to reach the next hop for the route to be active.

It changes automatically into a default route.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A static route does not automatically change into a default route; default routes are explicitly configured (e.g., ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next-hop) and are not derived from other static routes.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different scenario, if a static route was configured with a specific destination and the administrator later decided to change the route to a default route (0.0.0.0/0) for all traffic, this option could be correct if the question asked about the outcome of that specific configuration change.

Why candidates choose this

Students might confuse the behavior of floating static routes or think that a route can 'default' when its next hop fails, but that is incorrect.

It becomes an OSPF external route.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A static route does not become an OSPF external route automatically; OSPF routes are learned through the OSPF protocol, and a static route remains static unless redistributed into OSPF via configuration.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different scenario, if the question stated that a static route was configured and the router was running OSPF with a redistribution policy that converts static routes into OSPF external routes, then this option could be correct when the static route is redistributed into OSPF.

Why candidates choose this

Students may think that when a static route fails, the router might fall back to a dynamic routing protocol like OSPF, but that is not automatic.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

One of 1,389 original 200-301 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.