Courseiva
IP RoutinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA IP Routing Practice Question

A router shows the following route:

O    10.10.40.0/24 [110/20] via 192.0.2.2, 00:00:12, GigabitEthernet0/0

What does the value 110 represent?

⚠ Common exam trap

A frequent exam trap is mistaking the administrative distance value for the OSPF cost or metric. The number 110 in the route output is the administrative distance, not the cost to reach the destination. The OSPF cost is the second number inside the brackets, which in this example is 20. Confusing these values can lead to incorrect assumptions about route preference and path selection. Remember, administrative distance compares trustworthiness between routing protocols, while the metric determines the best path within a single protocol.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The administrative distance of OSPF

In Cisco route output, the value in brackets is [administrative distance/metric].

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The OSPF cost to the destination

    Why it's wrong here

    The OSPF cost to the destination is not the first value but the second, appearing after the administrative distance within the same brackets. In the route output '110/20', the '110' is the AD and '20' is the OSPF cost, which is derived from the cumulative interface costs along the path. A common mistake is to read the first number as cost, but OSPF cost is a separate metric that reflects bandwidth and is used by the SPF algorithm to calculate the shortest path.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a question asking about the OSPF cost to a specific destination, where the context is focused on OSPF metrics and path selection, this option could be correct. For example, if the question provided a route with an OSPF cost value instead of an administrative distance, then option A would be valid.

  • The administrative distance of OSPF

    Why this is correct

    In OSPF, the first number within the brackets of an IP routing table entry is the administrative distance (AD). For OSPF, this is a fixed default of 110, which represents the protocol's trustworthiness compared to other routing sources. The router uses this value to select the best route when multiple protocols offer paths to the same destination, with lower AD being preferred. Here, the '110' matches OSPF's standard AD, confirming this is the correct interpretation.

  • The number of hops to the destination

    Why it's wrong here

    OSPF does not use hop count as its metric or display it as the first value in a routing table entry. OSPF's metric is cost, which is based on interface bandwidth, and while a route may traverse multiple routers, the number of hops is not part of OSPF's path selection logic. In the given route, the '110' is clearly the administrative distance, not a hop count, because OSPF never reports hop count in this position. If you were looking for hop count, you'd need a different protocol like RIP, which uses a different format entirely.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different question, if it asked for the number of hops in a routing protocol that uses hop count as its metric, such as RIP, and provided a route with a hop count value, then this option would be correct.

  • The route age in seconds

    Why it's wrong here

    The route age in seconds is not shown inside the brackets; instead, it is a separate timer that appears after the next-hop identifier in the full 'show ip route' output. In the snippet '110/20 via', the first value '110' is the administrative distance, not an age. OSPF route age tracks how long the route has been known, but it is displayed as a standalone value, such as '00:12:34', and is unrelated to the numeric pair in brackets. Therefore, interpreting '110' as an age would be a misreading of the routing table's structure.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different question, if it asked for the age of a route in a routing table output that specifically included a field for route age, such as 'Route age: 00:00:12,' then the option could be correct if it explicitly stated that the age was represented in seconds.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

The administrative distance of OSPFCorrect answer

Why this is correct

In OSPF, the first number within the brackets of an IP routing table entry is the administrative distance (AD). For OSPF, this is a fixed default of 110, which represents the protocol's trustworthiness compared to other routing sources. The router uses this value to select the best route when multiple protocols offer paths to the same destination, with lower AD being preferred. Here, the '110' matches OSPF's standard AD, confirming this is the correct interpretation.

The OSPF cost to the destinationWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This option is incorrect because the value 110 in the route indicates the administrative distance of OSPF, not the OSPF cost. The OSPF cost is a different metric used for path selection within OSPF itself.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a question asking about the OSPF cost to a specific destination, where the context is focused on OSPF metrics and path selection, this option could be correct. For example, if the question provided a route with an OSPF cost value instead of an administrative distance, then option A would be valid.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might confuse the administrative distance with OSPF cost due to their close association in routing protocols, leading them to mistakenly select this option when they recall that OSPF uses costs for path metrics.

The number of hops to the destinationWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This option is incorrect because the value 110 in the route indicates the administrative distance of OSPF, not the number of hops. OSPF uses a different metric based on link cost rather than simple hop count.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different question, if it asked for the number of hops in a routing protocol that uses hop count as its metric, such as RIP, and provided a route with a hop count value, then this option would be correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse the concept of administrative distance with hop count, especially if they have encountered routing protocols that use hops as a metric, leading them to mistakenly select this option.

The route age in secondsWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This option is incorrect because the value 110 in the route indicates the administrative distance of OSPF, not the route age. The route age is typically represented separately and is not included in the route metric.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different question, if it asked for the age of a route in a routing table output that specifically included a field for route age, such as 'Route age: 00:00:12,' then the option could be correct if it explicitly stated that the age was represented in seconds.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may find this option tempting because they might confuse route age with the time since the route was last updated, leading them to mistakenly associate the time format with the value 110.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

PC R1 R2 R3 Server hop 1 hop 2 hop 3 RIP metric = 3 hops — lowest hop count wins

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

One of 1,389 original 200-301 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.