Question 1,311 of 1,819
Network Infrastructure and ConnectivityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Infrastructure and Connectivity Practice Question

This 200-301 practice question tests your understanding of network infrastructure and connectivity. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. A key principle to apply: a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet.. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A host uses subnet mask 255.255.255.224. How many total addresses exist in each subnet block?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Review the full subnetting walkthrough →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

32

The subnet mask 255.255.255.224 (/27) has 5 host bits, so each subnet has 2^5 = 32 total addresses. Option A (16) results from confusing /27 with /28 (4 host bits = 16). Option D (64) results from confusing /27 with /26 (6 host bits = 64). Option C (30) is the number of usable host addresses (32 - 2 = 30), not the total addresses asked for in the question.

Key principle: A subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • 16

    Why it's wrong here

    This is wrong because 16 total addresses corresponds to a /28 subnet.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question specified a subnet mask of 255.255.255.240 instead, which corresponds to 28 subnet bits, then the total number of addresses would be 16. This would make option A the correct answer in that context.

  • 32

    Why this is correct

    This is correct because /27 yields 32 total addresses per subnet.

    Related concept

    A subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet.

  • 30

    Why it's wrong here

    This is wrong because 30 is the usable host count, not the total address count.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question asked for the number of usable addresses in a subnet with a mask of 255.255.255.224, option C would be correct, as there are 30 usable addresses after accounting for the network and broadcast addresses.

  • 64

    Why it's wrong here

    This is wrong because 64 total addresses corresponds to a /26 subnet.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different question, if the subnet mask were 255.255.255.192, which allows for 64 addresses per subnet, option D would be correct. The question would need to specify that subnet mask to align with this answer.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

32Correct answer

Why this is correct

This is correct because /27 yields 32 total addresses per subnet.

16Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This option is wrong because a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 allows for 32 total addresses per subnet block, not 16. The calculation is based on the formula 2^(32 - subnet bits), where 224 corresponds to 27 subnet bits, yielding 32 addresses.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question specified a subnet mask of 255.255.255.240 instead, which corresponds to 28 subnet bits, then the total number of addresses would be 16. This would make option A the correct answer in that context.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option due to confusion between the number of usable addresses and total addresses, mistakenly recalling that 16 is a common subnet size for smaller networks.

30Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Option C is incorrect because a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 provides 32 total addresses per subnet block, not 30. The calculation is based on the formula 2^(32 - subnet bits), where 224 corresponds to 27 bits for the network.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question asked for the number of usable addresses in a subnet with a mask of 255.255.255.224, option C would be correct, as there are 30 usable addresses after accounting for the network and broadcast addresses.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option due to confusion between total addresses and usable addresses, leading them to mistakenly calculate the usable addresses instead of the total available in the subnet.

64Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This option is wrong because a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 provides 32 total addresses per subnet block, not 64. The calculation is based on the formula 2^(32 - subnet bits), where 224 corresponds to 3 bits for hosts.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different question, if the subnet mask were 255.255.255.192, which allows for 64 addresses per subnet, option D would be correct. The question would need to specify that subnet mask to align with this answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option due to confusion between the number of usable addresses and total addresses, or they might mistakenly associate larger subnet masks with larger address counts without proper calculation.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Be careful to distinguish between total addresses and usable addresses. Many candidates automatically think of usable addresses when subnetting.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Subnetting is a fundamental concept in IP networking that divides a larger network into smaller subnetworks, or subnets, to improve routing efficiency and security. The subnet mask 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, meaning the first 27 bits are fixed for network identification and the remaining 5 bits are available for host addressing within each subnet. This allocation directly impacts the total number of addresses available in each subnet block. The total number of addresses in a subnet is calculated as 2 raised to the power of the number of host bits. For a /27 subnet mask, there are 32 total addresses (2^5 = 32). Out of these, 30 addresses are usable for hosts because one address is reserved as the network identifier and another as the broadcast address. Cisco devices and CCNA exam questions often emphasize distinguishing between total addresses and usable host addresses to avoid confusion. A common exam trap is confusing the total number of addresses with the number of usable host addresses. Candidates frequently mistake 30 usable hosts as the total count, leading to incorrect answers. In practical Cisco networking, understanding this distinction is crucial for designing IP schemes and troubleshooting subnet-related issues. The total address count affects subnet planning, while usable hosts determine device capacity within each subnet.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • A subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet.
  • The total number of addresses in a subnet is calculated as 2 raised to the number of host bits, so a /27 subnet has 32 total addresses.
  • Out of the total addresses, 2 are reserved for the network and broadcast addresses, leaving 30 usable host addresses in a /27 subnet.
  • Cisco networking and CCNA exam questions distinguish between total addresses and usable host addresses to test precise subnetting knowledge.
  • Candidates often confuse usable host counts with total addresses, leading to common exam mistakes when calculating subnet sizes.
  • Subnetting impacts IP address allocation, routing efficiency, and network segmentation, making accurate calculations essential for Cisco network design.
  • Understanding subnet mask notation and its binary representation is critical for correctly determining subnet size and address ranges.
  • The subnet mask directly influences how many subnets and hosts per subnet can be created within a given IP address space.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

A subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer segments a warehouse floor into three subnets: 20 scanners, 5 printers, and 2 management hosts. Picking the wrong mask wastes addresses or leaves too few usable hosts. Exam questions test whether you can apply CIDR notation, calculate block size, and identify the correct usable-host range for a given prefix.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet., then practise related 200-301 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-301 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

Network Infrastructure and Connectivity — This question tests Network Infrastructure and Connectivity — A subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: 32 — The subnet mask 255.255.255.224 (/27) has 5 host bits, so each subnet has 2^5 = 32 total addresses. Option A (16) results from confusing /27 with /28 (4 host bits = 16). Option D (64) results from confusing /27 with /26 (6 host bits = 64). Option C (30) is the number of usable host addresses (32 - 2 = 30), not the total addresses asked for in the question.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Review a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet., then practise related 200-301 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

What is the key concept behind this question?

A subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 corresponds to a /27 prefix length, which allocates 5 bits for host addressing within each subnet.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: May 17, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.