Courseiva
Network Infrastructure and ConnectivitymediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Infrastructure and Connectivity Practice Question

A company wants private IPv4 addressing that can be routed internally but not on the public Internet. Which range meets that requirement?

⚠ Common exam trap

Be careful not to confuse reserved IP ranges for documentation or link-local use with private IP ranges.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

172.20.0.0/16

RFC 1918 defines private IPv4 ranges for internal routing: 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16. 172.20.0.0/16 falls within the 172.16.0.0/12 block, making it a valid private address. 198.51.100.0/24 is reserved for documentation (TEST-NET-2) and should not be used internally. 169.254.0.0/16 is link-local (APIPA), used only for automatic addressing on a single link. 224.0.0.0/4 is multicast, not routable as unicast and not private.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • 198.51.100.0/24

    Why it's wrong here

    198.51.100.0/24 is not a private address under RFC 1918; it belongs to the TEST-NET-2 documentation range (198.51.100.0 – 198.51.100.255) defined in RFC 5737. These addresses are reserved for use in documentation, example code, and troubleshooting guides, and while they can technically be routed, they are not intended for production private networks. Since the company needs actual private addressing for its operational network, this range fails the requirement.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question asked for an IP range that is suitable for documentation or examples in network design, then 198.51.100.0/24 would be correct, as it is specifically designated for such purposes.

  • 172.20.0.0/16

    Why this is correct

    172.20.0.0/16 is correct because it resides inside the RFC 1918 private block 172.16.0.0/12 (172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255). As a private address, it is not globally routable on the internet but is fully routable within an enterprise network, making it ideal for internal IPv4 design. The /16 prefix provides 65,534 usable host addresses, which is suitable for a large company's scalable internal infrastructure.

  • 169.254.0.0/16

    Why it's wrong here

    169.254.0.0/16 is the IPv4 link-local block used for Automatic Private IP Addressing (APIPA) on a single link, with no routing beyond that local segment. Addresses in this range are always configured automatically when a host fails to obtain a DHCP lease, and routers will not forward packets destined to this space. Therefore, it cannot be used for routable private addressing across a company network, even though it is considered 'private' in the sense of being non-globally routable.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a question asking for a range suitable for automatic IP address assignment in a local network without a DHCP server, 169.254.0.0/16 would be the correct answer. This scenario would focus on local connectivity rather than internal routing.

  • 224.0.0.0/4

    Why it's wrong here

    224.0.0.0/4 (224.0.0.0 – 239.255.255.255) is the multicast address space, not unicast private addressing. Multicast addresses are used for one-to-many communication, such as routing protocols (OSPF, EIGRP) or streaming, and are not routable as ordinary unicast traffic. Even though multicast packets can traverse a network, this range is fundamentally ineligible for assigning to interfaces as a source or destination unicast IPv4 address, so it fails the requirement for private IPv4 addressing.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a question asking for the range of IP addresses designated for multicast traffic within a private network, option D would be correct. For example, if the question specified the need for a range that supports multicast applications internally without public routing, then this option would be valid.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

172.20.0.0/16Correct answer

Why this is correct

172.20.0.0/16 is correct because it resides inside the RFC 1918 private block 172.16.0.0/12 (172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255). As a private address, it is not globally routable on the internet but is fully routable within an enterprise network, making it ideal for internal IPv4 design. The /16 prefix provides 65,534 usable host addresses, which is suitable for a large company's scalable internal infrastructure.

198.51.100.0/24Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Option A (198.51.100.0/24) is wrong because it falls within the range of documentation-only IP addresses, which are not intended for private use and can be routed on the public Internet.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question asked for an IP range that is suitable for documentation or examples in network design, then 198.51.100.0/24 would be correct, as it is specifically designated for such purposes.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might choose this option due to familiarity with the 198.51.100.0/24 range being used in examples and documentation, leading them to mistakenly associate it with private addressing.

169.254.0.0/16Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The 169.254.0.0/16 range is designated for link-local addresses, which are used for automatic IP address assignment in the absence of a DHCP server. These addresses cannot be routed beyond the local network segment, making them unsuitable for internal routing requirements.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a question asking for a range suitable for automatic IP address assignment in a local network without a DHCP server, 169.254.0.0/16 would be the correct answer. This scenario would focus on local connectivity rather than internal routing.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option due to familiarity with the 169.254.0.0 range as a private addressing scheme, mistakenly associating it with internal networking without recognizing its limitations in routing.

224.0.0.0/4Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Option D, 224.0.0.0/4, is incorrect because it is part of the multicast address range, which is used for one-to-many communication and not suitable for private addressing that is routable internally.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a question asking for the range of IP addresses designated for multicast traffic within a private network, option D would be correct. For example, if the question specified the need for a range that supports multicast applications internally without public routing, then this option would be valid.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might be tempted to choose this option due to a misunderstanding of IP address classes, confusing multicast addresses with private addressing, especially if they are familiar with the concept of internal communication.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 200-301 question from scratch — 1,389 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.