- A
Configure an Auto Scaling group with health checks to replace unhealthy instances.
Auto Scaling automatically replaces unhealthy instances.
- B
Use larger EC2 instance types.
Why wrong: Larger instances improve performance, not availability.
- C
Deploy the EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones.
Multi-AZ deployment protects against AZ failures.
- D
Use a single AWS Region for all instances.
Why wrong: Single region does not provide regional fault tolerance.
- E
Place all EC2 instances in a single subnet.
Why wrong: Single subnet is a single point of failure.
Quick Answer
The correct actions to improve availability are deploying EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones and using an Auto Scaling group to replace unhealthy instances. Distributing instances across multiple Availability Zones eliminates a single point of failure by ensuring that if one zone goes down, the Application Load Balancer can route traffic to healthy instances in another zone. An Auto Scaling group automatically replaces failed or unhealthy instances, maintaining the desired capacity and further enhancing fault tolerance. On the AWS Certified SysOps Administrator Associate SOA-C02 exam, this question tests your understanding of high-availability architecture patterns, often with traps like choosing a single subnet or a larger instance type—both of which improve performance or simplicity, not availability. A common memory tip is to remember that availability comes from redundancy across zones and automated recovery, not from bigger or fewer resources. Think “spread and replace” to recall the two key actions.
SOA-C02 Networking and Content Delivery Practice Question
This SOA-C02 practice question tests your understanding of networking and content delivery. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Which TWO actions can be taken to improve the availability of a web application hosted on EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer? (Select two.)
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Configure an Auto Scaling group with health checks to replace unhealthy instances.
Option A is correct because multi-AZ deployment distributes instances across Availability Zones for fault tolerance. Option B is correct because an Auto Scaling group can replace unhealthy instances automatically. Option C is wrong because a single subnet is a single point of failure. Option D is wrong because a larger instance type improves performance, not availability. Option E is wrong because a single region is more susceptible to regional failures.
Key principle: Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Configure an Auto Scaling group with health checks to replace unhealthy instances.
Why this is correct
Auto Scaling automatically replaces unhealthy instances.
Related concept
CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
- ✗
Use larger EC2 instance types.
Why it's wrong here
Larger instances improve performance, not availability.
- ✓
Deploy the EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones.
Why this is correct
Multi-AZ deployment protects against AZ failures.
Related concept
CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
- ✗
Use a single AWS Region for all instances.
Why it's wrong here
Single region does not provide regional fault tolerance.
- ✗
Place all EC2 instances in a single subnet.
Why it's wrong here
Single subnet is a single point of failure.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses
Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
- Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
- Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
- The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.
TExam Day Tips
- Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
- Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
- Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.
Key takeaway
Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
An e-commerce site experiences heavy traffic on Black Friday and near-zero traffic during off-peak weeks. Rather than provisioning permanent large VMs, the team uses auto-scaling groups that add capacity automatically under load and reduce it overnight. Questions like this test whether you understand elasticity, availability zones, and cloud compute scaling patterns.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related SOA-C02 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.
- →
Networking and Content Delivery — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Networking and Content Delivery practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SOA-C02 questions
1,546 questions across all exam domains
- →
AWS Certified SysOps Administrator Associate SOA-C02 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SOA-C02 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SOA-C02 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Monitoring, Logging, and Remediation practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to Monitoring, Logging, and Remediation.
Reliability and Business Continuity practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to Reliability and Business Continuity.
Deployment, Provisioning, and Automation practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to Deployment, Provisioning, and Automation.
Security and Compliance practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to Security and Compliance.
Networking and Content Delivery practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to Networking and Content Delivery.
Cost and Performance Optimization practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to Cost and Performance Optimization.
SOA-C02 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to SOA-C02 fundamentals.
SOA-C02 scenario practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to SOA-C02 scenario.
SOA-C02 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SOA-C02 questions linked to SOA-C02 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SOA-C02 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SOA-C02 question test?
Networking and Content Delivery — This question tests Networking and Content Delivery — CIDR notation defines the prefix length..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Configure an Auto Scaling group with health checks to replace unhealthy instances. — Option A is correct because multi-AZ deployment distributes instances across Availability Zones for fault tolerance. Option B is correct because an Auto Scaling group can replace unhealthy instances automatically. Option C is wrong because a single subnet is a single point of failure. Option D is wrong because a larger instance type improves performance, not availability. Option E is wrong because a single region is more susceptible to regional failures.
What should I do if I get this SOA-C02 question wrong?
Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related SOA-C02 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.
What is the key concept behind this question?
CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
2 more ways this is tested on SOA-C02
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Which TWO actions can a SysOps administrator take to improve the availability of a web application using an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and EC2 instances? (Choose two.)
medium- A.Place all instances in a single subnet to reduce latency
- ✓ B.Configure health checks on the target group
- ✓ C.Deploy EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones
- D.Use larger instance types to handle more traffic
- E.Increase the deregistration delay (connection draining) timeout
Why B: Options B and C are correct: Deploying EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones provides high availability, and configuring health checks allows the ALB to route traffic only to healthy instances. Option A is wrong because using a larger instance type improves performance, not availability. Option D is wrong because a single subnet is a single point of failure. Option E is wrong because increasing the deregistration delay does not improve availability; it only affects connection draining.
Variation 2. Which TWO actions should a SysOps administrator take to improve the availability and reduce latency for a web application hosted on EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer?
medium- A.Use larger EC2 instance types to handle more traffic.
- B.Configure the ALB health check to have a shorter interval.
- C.Use an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the ALB to cache content at edge locations.
- ✓ D.Implement Auto Scaling to add instances based on CPU utilization.
- ✓ E.Deploy EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones.
Why D: Deploying across multiple Availability Zones increases fault tolerance. Using Auto Scaling helps maintain performance during traffic spikes by adding or removing instances. Option C is incorrect because increasing instance size might help but does not provide the same resilience as distributing across AZs. Option D is incorrect because reducing health check interval increases load but not availability. Option E is incorrect because using a single EBS volume does not improve availability.
Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026
This SOA-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SOA-C02 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.