Question 624 of 1,546
Cost and Performance OptimizationhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to modify the Auto Scaling group to use a mixed instances policy with a percentage of Spot Instances and a fallback to On-Demand. This is the most cost-effective solution because Spot Instances offer up to 90% discounts for fault-tolerant, interruptible workloads like batch processing, and the On-Demand fallback ensures the job completes even if Spot capacity is reclaimed. On the AWS Certified SysOps Administrator Associate SOA-C02 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of cost optimization for transient, high-memory workloads—a common trap is choosing Reserved Instances or Savings Plans, which require long-term commitments unsuitable for sporadic 6-hour daily runs. Remember that Spot Instances are ideal for stateless, batch jobs that can handle interruptions, while the mixed instances policy provides both savings and reliability. A useful memory tip: "Spot for savings, On-Demand for safety" when your batch can tolerate a fallback.

SOA-C02 Cost and Performance Optimization Practice Question

This SOA-C02 practice question tests your understanding of cost and performance optimization. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A SysOps team manages a fleet of EC2 instances used for batch processing. The workload runs daily, taking approximately 6 hours. The instances are launched via an Auto Scaling group using On-Demand instances from a custom AMI. The team has noticed that while the instances are running, the CPU utilization is moderate, but the memory usage is high. After the batch completes, the instances are terminated. The team wants to reduce costs without changing the architecture. Which solution would be MOST cost-effective?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full NAT/PAT explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Modify the Auto Scaling group to use a mixed instances policy with a percentage of Spot Instances and a fallback to On-Demand.

Option A is correct because Spot Instances can provide significant discounts (up to 90%) for fault-tolerant batch workloads, and the team can use a mixed instances policy with On-Demand as a fallback. Option B (memory optimized instances) would likely increase cost. Option C (reserved instances) is not suitable for short-lived, sporadic workloads. Option D (savings plan) could help but still requires committing to a consistent amount, which may not align with the varying batch size. Option A offers the most flexibility and cost savings.

Key principle: NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Modify the Auto Scaling group to use a mixed instances policy with a percentage of Spot Instances and a fallback to On-Demand.

    Why this is correct

    Spot Instances are ideal for fault-tolerant workloads like batch processing, offering large discounts.

    Related concept

    Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

  • Use a Compute Savings Plan covering the entire compute usage across the account.

    Why it's wrong here

    Savings Plans require a commitment; the batch workload may not have consistent enough usage to benefit optimally.

  • Change the instance type to a memory-optimized family to reduce the number of instances needed.

    Why it's wrong here

    Memory-optimized instances are more expensive per vCPU; the issue is memory usage, but the workload is moderate CPU, so switching may increase cost.

  • Purchase Reserved Instances for the expected daily usage to get a lower hourly rate.

    Why it's wrong here

    Reserved Instances are best for steady-state, predictable workloads, not for short daily batches that may vary in size.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Key takeaway

NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A startup's cloud architect reviews their monthly bill and notices costs are higher than expected for a long-running batch job. Switching from on-demand instances to Reserved Instances — or using Spot/Preemptible VMs — can reduce compute costs by up to 72 %. Questions like this test whether you understand the tradeoffs between commitment, flexibility, and cost across cloud pricing models.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review the four NAT address types (inside local, inside global, outside local, outside global), PAT port overload, and static vs dynamic NAT use cases. Then practise related SOA-C02 NAT questions on configuration and troubleshooting.

Related practice questions

Related SOA-C02 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SOA-C02 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SOA-C02 question test?

Cost and Performance Optimization — This question tests Cost and Performance Optimization — Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Modify the Auto Scaling group to use a mixed instances policy with a percentage of Spot Instances and a fallback to On-Demand. — Option A is correct because Spot Instances can provide significant discounts (up to 90%) for fault-tolerant batch workloads, and the team can use a mixed instances policy with On-Demand as a fallback. Option B (memory optimized instances) would likely increase cost. Option C (reserved instances) is not suitable for short-lived, sporadic workloads. Option D (savings plan) could help but still requires committing to a consistent amount, which may not align with the varying batch size. Option A offers the most flexibility and cost savings.

What should I do if I get this SOA-C02 question wrong?

Review the four NAT address types (inside local, inside global, outside local, outside global), PAT port overload, and static vs dynamic NAT use cases. Then practise related SOA-C02 NAT questions on configuration and troubleshooting.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

3 more ways this is tested on SOA-C02

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A company runs a batch processing job every Saturday for 3 hours. The job can be interrupted and resumed at any point. The SysOps administrator wants to minimize compute costs for this workload. Which EC2 purchasing option should the administrator use?

easy
  • A.On-Demand Instances
  • B.Reserved Instances
  • C.Spot Instances
  • D.Dedicated Hosts

Why C: Spot Instances are ideal for fault-tolerant, interruptible workloads like batch processing that can be resumed. They offer significant cost savings (up to 90% compared to On-Demand) because they use spare EC2 capacity, which can be reclaimed by AWS with a 2-minute interruption notice. Since the job runs only 3 hours weekly and can be interrupted and resumed, Spot Instances minimize compute costs effectively.

Variation 2. A company runs a batch processing job every night that takes 2 hours on a single m5.xlarge EC2 instance. The job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted. The SysOps administrator wants to reduce costs. Which solution is MOST cost-effective?

medium
  • A.Use an On-Demand instance and set up a CloudWatch alarm to stop it when the job completes.
  • B.Use a Spot Instance with a Spot Fleet that includes a fallback to On-Demand if Spot is not available.
  • C.Use a Dedicated Host to run the job.
  • D.Purchase a Reserved Instance for the m5.xlarge instance.

Why B: Option D is correct because using Spot Instances with a fleet and fallback to On-Demand provides cost savings while ensuring the job completes. Option A is wrong because Reserved Instances require a commitment and may not be cost-effective for a 2-hour daily job. Option B is wrong because Dedicated Hosts are expensive. Option C is wrong because using only On-Demand is more expensive than using Spot.

Variation 3. A company runs a batch processing job on a single EC2 instance that runs for 2 hours every night. The job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted. The SysOps administrator wants to minimize compute costs. What is the MOST cost-effective solution?

easy
  • A.Use an On-Demand instance to ensure the job runs every night.
  • B.Purchase a Reserved Instance for 1 year to get a discount.
  • C.Launch a Dedicated Host to ensure consistent performance.
  • D.Use a Spot Instance that can be interrupted but is significantly cheaper.

Why D: A Spot Instance is the most cost-effective choice because the job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted, allowing you to leverage unused AWS EC2 capacity at up to 90% discount compared to On-Demand pricing. Since the job runs for only 2 hours nightly and can handle interruptions, Spot Instances provide the lowest compute cost while meeting the workload requirements.

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SOA-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SOA-C02 exam.