A company is migrating an SAP system to AWS and needs to ensure high availability for SAP Central Services (ASCS) and Enqueue Replication Server (ERS). Which architecture meets SAP's high availability requirements?
This is the recommended architecture for SAP ASCS/ERS HA, using Pacemaker and a floating IP.
Why this answer
A cluster solution with a shared file system and a virtual IP address in a multi-AZ setup meets SAP's high availability requirements for ASCS and ERS. This architecture ensures automatic failover across Availability Zones (AZs) and is the standard recommendation for SAP HA. Option B is incorrect because deploying ASCS and ERS in a single AZ with automatic restart does not protect against AZ failure.
Option C is incorrect because an Application Load Balancer is designed for HTTP/HTTPS traffic, not for SAP Central Services which require a shared file system and virtual IP. Option D is incorrect because Amazon Route 53 health checks alone do not provide the fast failover required; they are typically used with DNS-based failover, not cluster-based HA.