SAP Licensing on AWS: BYOL Considerations
A company is migrating its SAP landscape to AWS and has a requirement to use existing software licenses to reduce costs. Which AWS pricing model should be used?
Quick Answer
Bringing existing SAP software licenses to AWS to reduce costs is fundamentally a licensing-visibility problem: many SAP license structures are tied to the number of physical cores or sockets a system runs on, so the AWS pricing model chosen has to expose that underlying physical hardware detail rather than abstracting it away. Dedicated Hosts do exactly that - they give you visibility into and control over the specific physical server, including its cores and sockets, which lets you track and apply your existing per-core or per-socket SAP licenses the same way you would on-premises, rather than losing that mapping in a virtualized, shared-hardware environment. This is the key distinction from the other pricing and purchasing options: Compute Savings Plans and Reserved Instances both offer cost discounts in exchange for usage or capacity commitments, but neither exposes the physical hardware in a way that supports bring-your-own-license tracking, since they're purely commercial and billing constructs layered on top of standard EC2 capacity. Dedicated Instances are closer conceptually, since they provide hardware isolation for a single customer, but they still don't expose the physical server's core and socket details the way Dedicated Hosts do, which is specifically what license tracking for per-core or per-socket SAP licensing requires. Whenever a scenario mentions bringing existing licenses that are tied to physical cores or sockets, Dedicated Hosts is the AWS pricing model built to support that requirement, as opposed to any pricing model focused purely on cost savings without hardware visibility.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Dedicated Hosts
Dedicated Hosts provide visibility into the underlying physical cores and sockets, enabling you to bring your own existing SAP licenses (e.g., per-core or per-socket) to AWS and reduce costs. Option B (Compute Savings Plans) offers discounts on compute usage but does not support license management. Option C (Reserved Instances) provides capacity reservation and cost savings but does not allow use of your own licenses. Option D (Dedicated Instances) offers instance isolation at the hardware level but does not expose the underlying physical server for license tracking.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Dedicated Hosts
Why this is correct
Dedicated Hosts allow per-socket/core licensing.
- ✗
Compute Savings Plans
Why it's wrong here
Savings Plans are for compute cost savings, not licensing.
- ✗
Reserved Instances (RI)
Why it's wrong here
RIs provide capacity reservation, not license flexibility.
- ✗
Dedicated Instances
Why it's wrong here
Dedicated Instances provide isolation, not license management.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 1,616 original PAS-C01 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
2 more ways this is tested on PAS-C01
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A company is migrating its SAP system to AWS and wants to ensure that the migration does not violate any SAP licensing requirements. Which of the following is a correct licensing consideration?
easy- A.SAP licenses are based on the number of AWS accounts used
- ✓ B.SAP licenses must be purchased separately from SAP or an SAP partner
- C.SAP licenses are automatically included when you use AWS Launch Wizard
- D.SAP licenses are not required for non-production environments in AWS
Why B: SAP requires that customers have proper licenses for all systems, including production and non-production, running on AWS. Option A is wrong because AWS does not provide SAP licenses by default. Option C is wrong because SAP licensing is based on the number of users or processor cores, not on the AWS account. Option D is wrong because SAP licensing is required for all environments.
Variation 2. A company is planning to migrate an SAP ERP system to AWS. They want to use an existing software license with no additional cost. Which AWS service allows them to bring their own SAP license?
easy- A.AWS Organizations
- ✓ B.AWS License Manager
- C.AWS Systems Manager
- D.AWS Service Catalog
Why B: AWS License Manager is the correct service for bring-your-own-license (BYOL) for SAP. Option A is wrong because AWS Organizations is for multi-account governance. Option C is wrong because AWS Systems Manager is for management, not licensing. Option D is wrong because AWS Service Catalog is for provisioning approved services.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PAS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PAS-C01 exam.