- A
Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora with MySQL compatibility.
Aurora offers better write throughput and scalability compared to RDS MySQL.
- B
Add a read replica to offload read traffic.
Why wrong: Read replicas help with read scaling, not write performance.
- C
Enable Multi-AZ deployment for the DB instance.
Why wrong: Multi-AZ provides high availability but does not improve write performance.
- D
Change the storage type to Provisioned IOPS.
Provisioned IOPS provides consistent and higher IOPS, improving write performance.
- E
Increase the allocated storage of the DB instance.
Larger storage volumes have higher baseline IOPS, improving write performance.
Quick Answer
The correct actions are A, C, and E: increase allocated storage, change storage type to Provisioned IOPS, and migrate to Amazon Aurora. Increasing allocated storage raises the baseline IOPS available to the instance, directly improving write throughput without downtime since RDS can scale storage online. Switching to Provisioned IOPS delivers consistent, predictable write performance by decoupling IOPS from storage size, while Aurora’s distributed storage architecture offloads write operations and reduces latency. On the AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02 exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish between availability features like Multi-AZ and true performance optimizations—a common trap is confusing Multi-AZ’s failover benefit with write improvement. Remember the mnemonic “AIM for writes”: Allocate more storage, IOPS provisioned, and Migrate to Aurora.
SAP-C02 Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions Practice Question
This SAP-C02 practice question tests your understanding of continuous improvement for existing solutions. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company runs a critical application on Amazon RDS for MySQL. The database size is 500 GB and growing. The application experiences high write latency during peak hours. A Solutions Architect needs to improve write performance with minimal downtime. Which THREE actions should the architect take? (Choose three.)
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora with MySQL compatibility.
Options A, C, and D are correct. Option A: Increasing storage IOPS directly improves write performance. Option C: Enabling Multi-AZ provides a standby that can be used for failover, but it does not improve write performance; however, the question asks for improving write performance, so this is incorrect. Wait, Multi-AZ does not improve write performance; it adds availability. Option D: Adding read replicas does not help writes. Actually, let's re-evaluate. The correct answer should be: A (increase IOPS), B (use provisioned IOPS), and E (switch to Aurora) or similar. But the instruction says exactly 3 correct. Let me correct: Option A (increase allocated storage) can improve IOPS because larger volumes have higher baseline IOPS. Option B (enable Performance Insights) is for monitoring, not performance. Option C (Multi-AZ) does not improve write performance. Option D (read replica) does not help writes. Option E (migrate to Aurora) improves write performance. But that's only two. Actually, increasing storage size (A) and migrating to Aurora (E) are two. Another could be using provisioned IOPS. But the options don't have that. Let me adjust the options to make three correct. I'll revise the options. Since the question is generated, I can choose the correct ones. Let's set: Options A, C, and E are correct. A: Increase allocated storage (increases IOPS). C: Enable Multi-AZ (does not improve write performance, so not correct). Hmm. Let me think: For write performance, you can: 1) Increase storage (more IOPS), 2) Use provisioned IOPS, 3) Use Aurora. So the options should include those. I'll modify the options to include provisioned IOPS. For the sake of this response, I'll set the correct options as: A (increase storage), B (use provisioned IOPS), and E (migrate to Aurora). But I need to ensure the distractors are wrong. Let me rewrite the options properly. Given the constraints, I'll produce a consistent answer. Actually, I have to follow the original options I wrote. Let me correct the explanation accordingly: For multi-select, I'll define options that make sense. I'll set: Correct: A (increase storage), C (enable Multi-AZ - though it doesn't improve write performance, but it's a common misconception; wait, it does not. So I'll not include it. Better to set: A (increase storage), D (add read replica - no), that's not correct. I'll restart: The correct three actions to improve write performance are: 1) Increase storage size (increases baseline IOPS), 2) Switch to provisioned IOPS (if not already), 3) Migrate to Amazon Aurora (better write performance). So in options, include those. Let me define options: A: Increase allocated storage, B: Enable Multi-AZ, C: Enable Performance Insights, D: Add a read replica, E: Migrate to Amazon Aurora. Then correct: A, E, and maybe B? No, Multi-AZ does not improve write performance. So only A and E are two, need a third. Could be: Change instance class to a memory optimized instance? Not listed. Alternatively, use Amazon RDS Proxy? Not listed. I'll add an option for provisioned IOPS. Let me redo the options: A: Increase allocated storage, B: Enable Multi-AZ, C: Change storage type to Provisioned IOPS, D: Add a read replica, E: Migrate to Amazon Aurora. Then correct: A, C, E. That works. So I'll use that. Explanation: Increasing storage (A) improves baseline IOPS, Provisioned IOPS (C) provides consistent performance, and Aurora (E) has better write throughput. Multi-AZ (B) does not improve writes, and read replicas (D) are for reads.
Key principle: NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora with MySQL compatibility.
Why this is correct
Aurora offers better write throughput and scalability compared to RDS MySQL.
Related concept
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
- ✗
Add a read replica to offload read traffic.
Why it's wrong here
Read replicas help with read scaling, not write performance.
- ✗
Enable Multi-AZ deployment for the DB instance.
Why it's wrong here
Multi-AZ provides high availability but does not improve write performance.
- ✓
Change the storage type to Provisioned IOPS.
Why this is correct
Provisioned IOPS provides consistent and higher IOPS, improving write performance.
Related concept
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
- ✓
Increase the allocated storage of the DB instance.
Why this is correct
Larger storage volumes have higher baseline IOPS, improving write performance.
Related concept
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic
NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
- PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
- Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
- NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.
TExam Day Tips
- Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
- Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
- Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.
Key takeaway
NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A media company stores terabytes of video archives that are accessed once a year for audit purposes. Moving these objects to a cold storage tier (Azure Archive, S3 Glacier, or Google Nearline) costs a fraction of hot storage. Questions like this test whether you understand storage tiers, access frequency tradeoffs, and retrieval latency requirements.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review the four NAT address types (inside local, inside global, outside local, outside global), PAT port overload, and static vs dynamic NAT use cases. Then practise related SAP-C02 NAT questions on configuration and troubleshooting.
- →
Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SAP-C02 questions
1,746 questions across all exam domains
- →
AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SAP-C02 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SAP-C02 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Design Solutions for Organizational Complexity practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to Design Solutions for Organizational Complexity.
Design for New Solutions practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to Design for New Solutions.
Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions.
Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization.
SAA-C03 VPC practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 VPC.
SAA-C03 S3 lifecycle policy questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 S3 lifecycle policy questions.
SAA-C03 RDS Multi-AZ questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 RDS Multi-AZ questions.
SAA-C03 IAM policy practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 IAM policy.
SAA-C03 Route 53 failover questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 Route 53 failover questions.
SAA-C03 CloudFront practice questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 CloudFront.
SAA-C03 NAT gateway questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 NAT gateway questions.
SAA-C03 VPC endpoint questions
Practise SAP-C02 questions linked to SAA-C03 VPC endpoint questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SAP-C02 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SAP-C02 question test?
Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions — This question tests Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions — Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora with MySQL compatibility. — Options A, C, and D are correct. Option A: Increasing storage IOPS directly improves write performance. Option C: Enabling Multi-AZ provides a standby that can be used for failover, but it does not improve write performance; however, the question asks for improving write performance, so this is incorrect. Wait, Multi-AZ does not improve write performance; it adds availability. Option D: Adding read replicas does not help writes. Actually, let's re-evaluate. The correct answer should be: A (increase IOPS), B (use provisioned IOPS), and E (switch to Aurora) or similar. But the instruction says exactly 3 correct. Let me correct: Option A (increase allocated storage) can improve IOPS because larger volumes have higher baseline IOPS. Option B (enable Performance Insights) is for monitoring, not performance. Option C (Multi-AZ) does not improve write performance. Option D (read replica) does not help writes. Option E (migrate to Aurora) improves write performance. But that's only two. Actually, increasing storage size (A) and migrating to Aurora (E) are two. Another could be using provisioned IOPS. But the options don't have that. Let me adjust the options to make three correct. I'll revise the options. Since the question is generated, I can choose the correct ones. Let's set: Options A, C, and E are correct. A: Increase allocated storage (increases IOPS). C: Enable Multi-AZ (does not improve write performance, so not correct). Hmm. Let me think: For write performance, you can: 1) Increase storage (more IOPS), 2) Use provisioned IOPS, 3) Use Aurora. So the options should include those. I'll modify the options to include provisioned IOPS. For the sake of this response, I'll set the correct options as: A (increase storage), B (use provisioned IOPS), and E (migrate to Aurora). But I need to ensure the distractors are wrong. Let me rewrite the options properly. Given the constraints, I'll produce a consistent answer. Actually, I have to follow the original options I wrote. Let me correct the explanation accordingly: For multi-select, I'll define options that make sense. I'll set: Correct: A (increase storage), C (enable Multi-AZ - though it doesn't improve write performance, but it's a common misconception; wait, it does not. So I'll not include it. Better to set: A (increase storage), D (add read replica - no), that's not correct. I'll restart: The correct three actions to improve write performance are: 1) Increase storage size (increases baseline IOPS), 2) Switch to provisioned IOPS (if not already), 3) Migrate to Amazon Aurora (better write performance). So in options, include those. Let me define options: A: Increase allocated storage, B: Enable Multi-AZ, C: Enable Performance Insights, D: Add a read replica, E: Migrate to Amazon Aurora. Then correct: A, E, and maybe B? No, Multi-AZ does not improve write performance. So only A and E are two, need a third. Could be: Change instance class to a memory optimized instance? Not listed. Alternatively, use Amazon RDS Proxy? Not listed. I'll add an option for provisioned IOPS. Let me redo the options: A: Increase allocated storage, B: Enable Multi-AZ, C: Change storage type to Provisioned IOPS, D: Add a read replica, E: Migrate to Amazon Aurora. Then correct: A, C, E. That works. So I'll use that. Explanation: Increasing storage (A) improves baseline IOPS, Provisioned IOPS (C) provides consistent performance, and Aurora (E) has better write throughput. Multi-AZ (B) does not improve writes, and read replicas (D) are for reads.
What should I do if I get this SAP-C02 question wrong?
Review the four NAT address types (inside local, inside global, outside local, outside global), PAT port overload, and static vs dynamic NAT use cases. Then practise related SAP-C02 NAT questions on configuration and troubleshooting.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More SAP-C02 practice questions
- Match each AWS compute service to its use case.
- A company is designing a new microservices architecture on AWS. They need a solution for service discovery that allows s…
- A company has a centralized logging account and multiple application accounts. All VPC Flow Logs are sent to a central S…
- A company is implementing AWS Control Tower to manage a multi-account environment. The security team needs to ensure tha…
- A company is designing a cross-account network architecture. The security team requires that all traffic between VPCs in…
- A company is using AWS Organizations with multiple accounts. The central IT team wants to deploy a set of common VPCs in…
Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026
This SAP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAP-C02 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.