Question 125 of 1,040
Design Resilient ArchitectureseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SAA-C03 Design Resilient Architectures Practice Question

This SAA-C03 practice question tests your understanding of design resilient architectures. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An engineering team deploys a stateless web API on EC2 using an Auto Scaling group and an Application Load Balancer (ALB). During a recent test, they noticed that when one Availability Zone was unavailable, traffic failed until new instances were manually launched. Which change most directly improves automatic failover for the compute layer within a single Region?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Ensure the ALB and Auto Scaling group span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones.

Option B is correct because an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and Auto Scaling group must span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones (AZs) to provide automatic failover. When one AZ becomes unavailable, the ALB automatically reroutes traffic to healthy targets in the remaining AZs, and the Auto Scaling group can launch replacement instances in the surviving AZs. This architecture ensures that the compute layer remains available without manual intervention.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Place the Auto Scaling group in only one subnet so instance launches are simpler.

    Why it's wrong here

    Using only one subnet/AZ removes redundancy. An AZ outage would still take down capacity until manual action occurs.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question asked for a cost-optimized design for a non-critical application where high availability is not required, and the goal is to simplify management and reduce cross-AZ data transfer costs, then using a single subnet would be appropriate.

  • Ensure the ALB and Auto Scaling group span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones.

    Why this is correct

    Spreading the ALB and Auto Scaling group across at least two AZs provides redundant capacity. If one AZ fails, the ALB continues routing to healthy targets in the other AZ.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increase the target group deregistration delay to allow old instances to stay longer.

    Why it's wrong here

    Changing deregistration delay affects connection draining, not capacity placement across AZs. It doesn’t create additional resilient instances.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This option would be correct in a scenario where the question asks how to ensure in-flight requests complete gracefully during a deployment or scaling event, without dropping connections. For example: 'An application requires that all active requests finish before instances are terminated during a rolling update. Which setting should be adjusted?'

  • Use a Network Load Balancer, but keep all subnets in a single Availability Zone.

    Why it's wrong here

    Switching load balancer type doesn’t fix the root cause. If capacity is only in one AZ, failures will still impact the service.

    When this WOULD be correct

    When the requirement is to handle extremely high throughput and low latency for a TCP/UDP workload, and the application is designed to run in a single Availability Zone (e.g., due to data locality constraints), a Network Load Balancer in that zone would be the correct choice.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The SAA-C03 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Ensure the ALB and Auto Scaling group span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones.Correct answer

Why this is correct

Spreading the ALB and Auto Scaling group across at least two AZs provides redundant capacity. If one AZ fails, the ALB continues routing to healthy targets in the other AZ.

Place the Auto Scaling group in only one subnet so instance launches are simpler.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Placing the Auto Scaling group in only one subnet (single AZ) defeats the purpose of high availability; if that AZ fails, all instances are lost, and the ALB has no healthy targets in other AZs to route traffic to, causing complete failure.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question asked for a cost-optimized design for a non-critical application where high availability is not required, and the goal is to simplify management and reduce cross-AZ data transfer costs, then using a single subnet would be appropriate.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that simplifying subnet configuration reduces complexity and potential misconfigurations, overlooking that this eliminates fault tolerance and the ability to survive an AZ outage.

Increase the target group deregistration delay to allow old instances to stay longer.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Increasing the deregistration delay keeps old instances longer, but does not help automatically launch new instances in a healthy AZ when one AZ fails. It only delays connection draining, not failover.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This option would be correct in a scenario where the question asks how to ensure in-flight requests complete gracefully during a deployment or scaling event, without dropping connections. For example: 'An application requires that all active requests finish before instances are terminated during a rolling update. Which setting should be adjusted?'

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that keeping instances longer provides more time for failover, confusing connection draining with automatic recovery. They overlook that the core issue is lack of multi-AZ redundancy, not connection timeout.

Use a Network Load Balancer, but keep all subnets in a single Availability Zone.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Using a single Availability Zone for all subnets does not provide automatic failover; if that zone fails, the NLB and instances become unavailable, which does not solve the problem described.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

When the requirement is to handle extremely high throughput and low latency for a TCP/UDP workload, and the application is designed to run in a single Availability Zone (e.g., due to data locality constraints), a Network Load Balancer in that zone would be the correct choice.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that a Network Load Balancer inherently provides better failover than an ALB, but failover depends on multi-AZ architecture, not the load balancer type.

Analysis generated from the official SAA-C03blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often think a single-AZ deployment with a load balancer provides failover, but without multiple AZs, the load balancer itself becomes a single point of failure and cannot reroute traffic when the AZ goes down.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, the ALB uses a DNS-based endpoint that resolves to multiple IP addresses, one per AZ subnet. When an AZ fails, the ALB health checks mark targets in that AZ as unhealthy and stops sending traffic to them, while the Auto Scaling group detects the missing capacity and launches new instances in the remaining AZs. This behavior is governed by the ALB's cross-zone load balancing setting (enabled by default) and the Auto Scaling group's 'Availability Zones' configuration, which must list at least two AZs for automatic recovery.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

An e-commerce site experiences heavy traffic on Black Friday and near-zero traffic during off-peak weeks. Rather than provisioning permanent large VMs, the team uses auto-scaling groups that add capacity automatically under load and reduce it overnight. Questions like this test whether you understand elasticity, availability zones, and cloud compute scaling patterns.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SAA-C03 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

Design Resilient Architectures — This question tests Design Resilient Architectures — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Ensure the ALB and Auto Scaling group span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones. — Option B is correct because an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and Auto Scaling group must span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones (AZs) to provide automatic failover. When one AZ becomes unavailable, the ALB automatically reroutes traffic to healthy targets in the remaining AZs, and the Auto Scaling group can launch replacement instances in the surviving AZs. This architecture ensures that the compute layer remains available without manual intervention.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SAA-C03 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SAA-C03 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAA-C03 exam.