Courseiva
Network ImplementationhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

ANS-C01 Network Implementation Practice Question

Network Topology
$ aws ec2 describe-vpn-connectionsvpn-connection-ids vpn-1234567890abcdef0Refer to the exhibit.```"VpnConnections": ["VpnConnectionId": "vpn-1234567890abcdef0","State": "available","CustomerGatewayConfiguration": "...","Type": "ipsec.1","CustomerGatewayId": "cgw-1234567890abcdef0","VpnGatewayId": "vgw-1234567890abcdef0","Options": {"EnableAcceleration": false,"StaticRoutesOnly": false,"LocalIpv4NetworkCidr": "0.0.0.0/0","RemoteIpv4NetworkCidr": "0.0.0.0/0","TunnelOptions": ["OutsideIpAddress": "52.0.0.1","TunnelInsideCidr": "169.254.10.0/30","PreSharedKey": "secret"},"OutsideIpAddress": "52.0.0.2","TunnelInsideCidr": "169.254.10.4/30","Routes": ["Source": "static","DestinationCidrBlock": "10.0.0.0/16","State": "available"

Refer to the exhibit. A VPN connection is established between an on-premises network (10.0.0.0/16) and an AWS VPC (172.16.0.0/16). The on-premises network can ping the VPC's private IP addresses, but the VPC cannot ping the on-premises network's IP addresses. The VPC route table has a route to 10.0.0.0/16 pointing to the VGW. What is the MOST likely cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

The ANS-C01 exam often tests the concept that a VPN tunnel being 'UP' does not guarantee bidirectional traffic; candidates mistakenly assume tunnel status implies full connectivity, but the real issue is often a missing return route on the on-premises side.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The on-premises network does not have a route to the VPC CIDR (172.16.0.0/16) pointing to the customer gateway

The on-premises network can ping the VPC because the VPC route table has a route to 10.0.0.0/16 pointing to the virtual private gateway (VGW), so return traffic from the VPC is correctly forwarded. However, the VPC cannot ping the on-premises network because the on-premises router lacks a route back to the VPC CIDR (172.16.0.0/16) pointing to the customer gateway (CGW). Without this return route, traffic from the VPC reaches the on-premises network, but the on-premises router drops the response packets as it does not know how to reach 172.16.0.0/16.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The VPN tunnels are not both in UP state

    Why it's wrong here

    The exhibit shows state 'available'.

  • The VPN acceleration is disabled, causing high latency

    Why it's wrong here

    Latency would not prevent pings.

  • The VPN connection is configured with static routes only and BGP is not used

    Why it's wrong here

    Static routes are fine for this scenario.

  • The on-premises network does not have a route to the VPC CIDR (172.16.0.0/16) pointing to the customer gateway

    Why this is correct

    Without a return route, traffic from VPC reaches on-premises but replies are dropped.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

About these practice questions

One of 1,621 original ANS-C01 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This ANS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ANS-C01 exam.