Courseiva
Network ImplementationeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

ANS-C01 Network Implementation Practice Question

A network engineer is setting up a Direct Connect connection from an on-premises data center to AWS. The connection uses a private VIF to connect to a VPC via a Direct Connect gateway. The on-premises network is advertising a BGP prefix 10.0.0.0/16, which overlaps with the VPC CIDR 10.0.0.0/16. What is the expected behavior?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many candidates assume BGP session failure due to prefix overlap, but BGP itself has no mechanism to reject a session based on prefix overlap; the overlap only affects route installation, not session state.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The BGP session will be established, but the overlapping prefix will be ignored and not programmed into the VPC route tables.

When a BGP prefix advertised over a Direct Connect private VIF overlaps with the VPC CIDR, the BGP session establishes successfully, but AWS ignores the overlapping prefix and does not install it into the VPC route tables. This is because AWS always prefers the local VPC route over any propagated BGP route for the same prefix, preventing traffic destined for the VPC from being blackholed or misrouted to on-premises.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The VPC will automatically reassign a new CIDR to avoid the conflict.

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS does not automatically modify VPC CIDRs.

  • The BGP session will fail to establish due to the prefix conflict.

    Why it's wrong here

    BGP session establishment is not affected by prefix overlap; only route advertisement is rejected.

  • The BGP session will be established, but the overlapping prefix will be ignored and not programmed into the VPC route tables.

    Why this is correct

    AWS does not allow overlapping prefixes to be injected into VPC route tables to prevent routing conflicts.

  • The on-premises prefix will take precedence and override the VPC route.

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS prioritizes local VPC routes over learned routes, so the VPC CIDR remains.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

About these practice questions

One of 1,621 original ANS-C01 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This ANS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ANS-C01 exam.