Question 1,137 of 1,705
Network DesignhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16. This is required because the existing VPC CIDR of 10.0.0.0/16 is a subset of the on-premises CIDR 10.0.0.0/8, and AWS Site-to-Site VPN cannot route traffic when destination prefixes overlap—the VPN relies on distinct, non-conflicting IP spaces in its route tables. On the AWS Certified Advanced Networking Specialty ANS-C01 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of IP address planning and the immutable nature of VPC CIDRs; once a VPC is created, you cannot shrink or modify its primary CIDR block, so the only fix is to create a new VPC or add a secondary CIDR that does not conflict. A common trap is assuming you can use VPC peering or NAT to resolve the overlap, but those solutions do not fix the fundamental routing conflict for VPN traffic. Memory tip: “If your VPC is a subset of on-prem, you must reset—change the block, don’t try to unlock.”

ANS-C01 Network Design Practice Question

This ANS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of network design. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company has a VPC with a CIDR of 10.0.0.0/16 and needs to connect to an on-premises network with CIDR 10.0.0.0/8. The company wants to use AWS Site-to-Site VPN. What configuration change is required to avoid routing conflicts?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full VPN explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16.

The VPC CIDR 10.0.0.0/16 is a subset of the on-premises CIDR 10.0.0.0/8. AWS Site-to-Site VPN cannot route traffic correctly when the VPC and on-premises networks have overlapping IP ranges because the VPN connection relies on distinct destination prefixes. The only way to eliminate the conflict is to change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16, ensuring no IP address overlap between the two networks.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Create a more specific route in the VPC route table for the on-premises CIDR.

    Why it's wrong here

    Overlap still causes ambiguity.

  • Enable route propagation on the VPC route tables.

    Why it's wrong here

    Does not resolve overlap.

  • Use a VPN connection with static routes instead of BGP.

    Why it's wrong here

    Does not resolve overlapping CIDRs.

  • Change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16.

    Why this is correct

    Eliminates the overlap.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates think they can override the conflict with a more specific route or by switching to static routes, but they overlook that the VPC's local route is always more specific than any VPN route for overlapping prefixes, making the conflict unresolvable without changing the VPC CIDR.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

AWS Site-to-Site VPN uses IPsec tunnels and relies on distinct destination CIDRs in the route table to forward traffic. When VPC CIDR 10.0.0.0/16 overlaps with on-premises 10.0.0.0/8, the VPC's local route (10.0.0.0/16) takes precedence over any VPN route (10.0.0.0/8) because the local route is more specific. This means traffic destined for on-premises hosts within the 10.0.0.0/8 range that falls outside the VPC's /16 will be dropped or misrouted. In real-world scenarios, overlapping CIDRs often require renumbering one side or using advanced techniques like NAT or Transit Gateway with multiple TGW attachments, but for a simple Site-to-Site VPN, a non-overlapping CIDR is mandatory.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A healthcare organisation deploys an application with a public-facing web tier and a private database tier. The database subnet has no public IP and only accepts connections from the web tier's security group. Questions like this test whether you can design cloud network isolation using VNets/VPCs, subnets, and security group rules.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related ANS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free ANS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this ANS-C01 question test?

Network Design — This question tests Network Design — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16. — The VPC CIDR 10.0.0.0/16 is a subset of the on-premises CIDR 10.0.0.0/8. AWS Site-to-Site VPN cannot route traffic correctly when the VPC and on-premises networks have overlapping IP ranges because the VPN connection relies on distinct destination prefixes. The only way to eliminate the conflict is to change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16, ensuring no IP address overlap between the two networks.

What should I do if I get this ANS-C01 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on ANS-C01

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A company has a VPC with CIDR 10.0.0.0/16 and needs to connect to an on-premises network with CIDR 10.0.0.0/8. They plan to use AWS Direct Connect with a private virtual interface. What should they do to resolve the overlapping CIDR conflict?

easy
  • A.Create a VPN connection with dynamic routing and use BGP to advertise the VPC CIDR.
  • B.Create a VPC peering connection between the VPC and the on-premises network.
  • C.Change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range, such as 172.16.0.0/16, and re-create the VPC with the new CIDR.
  • D.Use a NAT Gateway in the VPC to translate the on-premises IP addresses.

Why C: Option C is correct because AWS does not support network address translation (NAT) for overlapping CIDRs on a Direct Connect private virtual interface. The only way to resolve the conflict is to change the VPC CIDR to a non-overlapping range (e.g., 172.16.0.0/16) and recreate the VPC, as the VPC CIDR cannot be modified after creation. This ensures that routes between the VPC and on-premises network do not conflict.

Keep practising

More ANS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This ANS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ANS-C01 exam.