Question 451 of 1,755
Data EngineeringmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Data Engineering Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of data engineering. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which THREE factors should a data engineer consider when choosing between Amazon S3 and Amazon Redshift for storing large datasets used for machine learning? (Choose 3.)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Query performance and latency requirements

When choosing between Amazon S3 and Amazon Redshift for ML data storage, key considerations include: (A) Query performance and latency: Redshift offers low-latency SQL querying on structured data, while S3 provides higher latency for direct access, making performance needs critical. (C) Cost of storage vs. compute: S3 decouples storage and compute, allowing independent scaling; Redshift combines them, affecting cost. (D) Data format and compression: S3 supports any format, but Redshift works best with columnar formats like Parquet. (B) Encryption at rest and (E) Data retention policies are available in both, so they are not differentiating factors.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Query performance and latency requirements

    Why this is correct

    Redshift provides fast SQL analytics; S3 queries are slower.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Encryption at rest capabilities

    Why it's wrong here

    Both support encryption at rest.

  • Cost of storage vs. compute

    Why this is correct

    S3 is cheaper for storage; Redshift is more expensive but includes compute.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Data format and compression support

    Why this is correct

    S3 supports any format; Redshift optimizes columnar formats.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Data retention policies

    Why it's wrong here

    Both services support lifecycle policies; not a differentiator.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

A common mistake is assuming encryption or retention policies are unique to one service, when in fact both S3 and Redshift offer equivalent capabilities, making them irrelevant for this comparison.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

S3 achieves low-latency access through its distributed object store and HTTP-based API, enabling parallel reads across multiple partitions. Redshift uses a columnar storage engine with zone maps and sort keys to minimize I/O for analytical queries, but its cluster architecture introduces network overhead for data loading. In practice, ML teams often store raw data in S3 (e.g., 10 TB of Parquet files) and use Redshift for feature engineering on aggregated views, then export results back to S3 for training.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A startup's cloud architect reviews their monthly bill and notices costs are higher than expected for a long-running batch job. Switching from on-demand instances to Reserved Instances — or using Spot/Preemptible VMs — can reduce compute costs by up to 72 %. Questions like this test whether you understand the tradeoffs between commitment, flexibility, and cost across cloud pricing models.

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage ClassMin DurationRetrievalUse Case
S3 StandardNoneImmediateFrequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA30 daysImmediateInfrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA30 daysImmediateNon-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-TieringNoneImmediate–hoursUnknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant90 daysMillisecondsArchive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible90 daysMinutes–hoursArchive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive180 daysHoursLong-term compliance archive

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Data Engineering — This question tests Data Engineering — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Query performance and latency requirements — When choosing between Amazon S3 and Amazon Redshift for ML data storage, key considerations include: (A) Query performance and latency: Redshift offers low-latency SQL querying on structured data, while S3 provides higher latency for direct access, making performance needs critical. (C) Cost of storage vs. compute: S3 decouples storage and compute, allowing independent scaling; Redshift combines them, affecting cost. (D) Data format and compression: S3 supports any format, but Redshift works best with columnar formats like Parquet. (B) Encryption at rest and (E) Data retention policies are available in both, so they are not differentiating factors.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More MLS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.