← MLS-C01·Amazon Web Services

Question 761 of 1,755

Exploratory Data Analysis →mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of exploratory data analysis. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A data engineer is performing EDA on a dataset containing user activity logs from a mobile app. The dataset has 10 million rows and includes columns: 'user_id', 'event_type', 'timestamp', 'device_type', and 'session_duration'. The engineer uses Amazon Athena to query the data stored in S3 as CSV files. The engineer runs a query to find the average session_duration per device_type, but the query takes over 5 minutes and scans 100 GB of data. The engineer wants to reduce query cost and improve performance for future EDA. The dataset is not partitioned, and the engineer anticipates frequent queries filtering on 'timestamp' and 'device_type'. Which action will most effectively reduce data scanned?

A
Partition the table by date derived from timestamp and convert to Parquet.
Combining partitioning and columnar storage maximizes reduction in scanned data.
B
Use random sampling to query a subset of data.
Why wrong: Sampling reduces accuracy and may not be acceptable for EDA.
C
Convert the data to Parquet format and use columnar storage.
Why wrong: Parquet reduces bytes scanned but without partitioning, still full scan of columns.
D
Partition the table by device_type.
Why wrong: Partitioning by device_type helps only if filtering by device_type, not timestamp.

Full breakdown with real-world context →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Partition the table by date derived from timestamp and convert to Parquet.

Option A is the most effective because it combines partitioning by date (derived from timestamp) and converting to Parquet format. Partitioning by date enables partition pruning for queries filtering on 'timestamp', drastically reducing the amount of data scanned. Parquet provides columnar storage and compression, further minimizing I/O and cost. Option C (Parquet without partitioning) still requires full file scans when filters are applied. Option B (random sampling) sacrifices accuracy for speed, which is undesirable for accurate EDA. Option D (partitioning by device_type) helps only for device_type filters, not for the common timestamp filters mentioned in the scenario.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

✓
Partition the table by date derived from timestamp and convert to Parquet.
Why this is correct
Combining partitioning and columnar storage maximizes reduction in scanned data.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
Use random sampling to query a subset of data.
Why it's wrong here
Sampling reduces accuracy and may not be acceptable for EDA.
✗
Convert the data to Parquet format and use columnar storage.
Why it's wrong here
Parquet reduces bytes scanned but without partitioning, still full scan of columns.
✗
Partition the table by device_type.
Why it's wrong here
Partitioning by device_type helps only if filtering by device_type, not timestamp.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

Underline the problem statement mentally.
Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A startup's cloud architect reviews their monthly bill and notices costs are higher than expected for a long-running batch job. Switching from on-demand instances to Reserved Instances — or using Spot/Preemptible VMs — can reduce compute costs by up to 72 %. Questions like this test whether you understand the tradeoffs between commitment, flexibility, and cost across cloud pricing models.

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage Class	Min Duration	Retrieval	Use Case
S3 Standard	None	Immediate	Frequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA	30 days	Immediate	Infrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA	30 days	Immediate	Non-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-Tiering	None	Immediate–hours	Unknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant	90 days	Milliseconds	Archive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible	90 days	Minutes–hours	Archive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive	180 days	Hours	Long-term compliance archive

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Data Engineering practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Data Engineering.

Machine Learning Implementation and Operations practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Machine Learning Implementation and Operations.

Modeling practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Modeling.

Exploratory Data Analysis practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Exploratory Data Analysis.

MLS-C01 fundamentals practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 fundamentals.

MLS-C01 scenario practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 scenario.

MLS-C01 troubleshooting practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 troubleshooting.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

10 questions 20 questions 30 questions 50 questions Timed 30

MLS-C01 practice-test guide →Study guide →Browse all practice tests

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Exploratory Data Analysis — This question tests Exploratory Data Analysis — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Partition the table by date derived from timestamp and convert to Parquet. — Option A is the most effective because it combines partitioning by date (derived from timestamp) and converting to Parquet format. Partitioning by date enables partition pruning for queries filtering on 'timestamp', drastically reducing the amount of data scanned. Parquet provides columnar storage and compression, further minimizing I/O and cost. Option C (Parquet without partitioning) still requires full file scans when filters are applied. Option B (random sampling) sacrifices accuracy for speed, which is undesirable for accurate EDA. Option D (partitioning by device_type) helps only for device_type filters, not for the common timestamp filters mentioned in the scenario.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.