Question 948 of 1,755
Exploratory Data AnalysismediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of exploratory data analysis. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During EDA, a data scientist finds that two features have a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.95. What is the primary concern when using these features together in a linear regression model?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "primary"

    Why it matters: Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Multicollinearity will make coefficient estimates unstable

Option D is correct because a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.95 indicates strong multicollinearity between the two features. Multicollinearity inflates the variance of coefficient estimates, making them unstable and difficult to interpret. Option A is wrong because redundant information leads to multicollinearity, not underfitting; underfitting occurs when the model is too simple. Option B is wrong because heteroscedasticity refers to non-constant variance of errors, not correlation between features. Option C is wrong because overfitting is more associated with model complexity and variance, not directly with redundant features; in fact, redundant features can cause numerical instability but not necessarily overfitting.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The model will underfit because of redundant information

    Why it's wrong here

    Underfitting is due to insufficient model capacity.

  • Heteroscedasticity will be introduced

    Why it's wrong here

    Heteroscedasticity is about non-constant variance of errors, not correlation.

  • The model will overfit due to redundant features

    Why it's wrong here

    Overfitting is more about model complexity; correlation can inflate variance but not necessarily overfit.

  • Multicollinearity will make coefficient estimates unstable

    Why this is correct

    High correlation between predictors leads to multicollinearity, increasing standard errors.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "primary" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Exploratory Data Analysis — This question tests Exploratory Data Analysis — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Multicollinearity will make coefficient estimates unstable — Option D is correct because a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.95 indicates strong multicollinearity between the two features. Multicollinearity inflates the variance of coefficient estimates, making them unstable and difficult to interpret. Option A is wrong because redundant information leads to multicollinearity, not underfitting; underfitting occurs when the model is too simple. Option B is wrong because heteroscedasticity refers to non-constant variance of errors, not correlation between features. Option C is wrong because overfitting is more associated with model complexity and variance, not directly with redundant features; in fact, redundant features can cause numerical instability but not necessarily overfitting.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "primary". Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More MLS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.