Courseiva
Exploratory Data AnalysismediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

A machine learning engineer is analyzing a dataset with 500 features and suspects multicollinearity. Which TWO techniques can help identify and address multicollinearity during exploratory data analysis? (Choose TWO.)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Calculate Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for each feature

Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) measures how much the variance of a regression coefficient is inflated due to multicollinearity. Correlation matrix heatmap shows pairwise correlations. PCA reduces dimensionality but does not directly identify multicollinearity. Lasso regression addresses it via regularization but is a modeling step. t-SNE is for visualization of high-dimensional data.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Apply t-SNE for visualization

    Why it's wrong here

    t-SNE is for visualization, not for detecting multicollinearity.

  • Apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

    Why it's wrong here

    PCA transforms features but does not identify multicollinearity.

  • Calculate Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for each feature

    Why this is correct

    VIF > 5-10 indicates multicollinearity.

  • Generate a correlation matrix heatmap

    Why this is correct

    High pairwise correlations indicate multicollinearity.

  • Use Lasso regression to select features

    Why it's wrong here

    Lasso addresses multicollinearity but is a modeling technique, not EDA.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every MLS-C01 question from scratch — 1,672 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more way this is tested on MLS-C01

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A machine learning team is analyzing a dataset with numerical features. They compute the pairwise correlation matrix and find that two features, 'X1' and 'X2', have a correlation coefficient of 0.98. The team plans to train a linear regression model. Which of the following actions should the team take to avoid multicollinearity issues?

easy
  • A.Perform PCA on the dataset to reduce dimensionality.
  • B.Add an interaction term between X1 and X2 to the model.
  • C.Standardize both features using Z-score normalization.
  • D.Remove one of the two highly correlated features.

Why D: Removing one of the highly correlated features reduces multicollinearity. Option A is wrong because PCA creates new uncorrelated features but is not necessary for just two correlated features. Option B is wrong because adding an interaction term between X1 and X2 would actually increase multicollinearity. Option C is wrong because standard scaling does not address correlation between features.

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.